Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 26;16(8):2017-2024.
doi: 10.1039/c9sm01637f.

Thermal fracture kinetics of heterogeneous semiflexible polymers

Affiliations

Thermal fracture kinetics of heterogeneous semiflexible polymers

Alexander M Lorenzo et al. Soft Matter. .

Abstract

The fracture and severing of polymer chains plays a critical role in the failure of fibrous materials and the regulated turnover of intracellular filaments. Using continuum wormlike chain models, we investigate the fracture of semiflexible polymers via thermal bending fluctuations, focusing on the role of filament flexibility and dynamics. Our results highlight a previously unappreciated consequence of mechanical heterogeneity in the filament, which enhances the rate of thermal fragmentation particularly in cases where constraints hinder the movement of the chain ends. Although generally applicable to semiflexible chains with regions of different bending stiffness, the model is motivated by a specific biophysical system: the enhanced severing of actin filaments at the boundary between stiff bare regions and mechanically softened regions that are coated with cofilin regulatory proteins. The results presented here point to a potential mechanism for disassembly of polymeric materials in general and cytoskeletal actin networks in particular by the introduction of locally softened chain regions, as occurs with cofilin binding.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Model schematic and energy landscapes. (a) Lowest energy (athermal) configuration of homogeneous chain with fixed R/(2L) = 0.6 and model parameters labeled. (b) Free energy landscape for homogeneous chain shown in (a), plotted as a function of junction bending and normalized end distance. White line markes the lowest energy path to steeper junction angles. (c) Lowest energy configuration for a heterogeneous chain with fixed R/(2L) = 0.6 and p,1/p,2 = 10. Light blue segment corresponds to softer chain side. (d) Overall free energy landscape for the heterogeneous chain with h = 10.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Comparison of approximate dynamics over free energy landscapes versus Brownian dynamics simulations, for homogeneous chains (h = 1). (a) MFPT to a cutoff junction energy E*, for fixed end distance. (b) MFPT to a cutoff value of the normalized end-to-end distance r. (c) MFPT to a junction energy E*, with free chain ends. In all cases, dashed black lines correspond to first passage times calculated from the free energy landscapes, solid lines correspond to Brownian dynamics simulations. All times are non-dimensionalized by Dρ(0). Top panels show examples of start and end configurations, with junction color indicating energy at the junction.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Chain heterogeneity enhances junction fracture rates when chain end dynamics are slow. (a) Ratio of MFPT to fracture for uniformly stiff (h = 1) and heterogeneous (h = 10) chains is plotted versus the relative rate of chain end dynamics compared to junction dynamics. (b-c) Time to fragmentation in the limit of infinitely slow chain end dynamics. Dimensionless MFPT is shown as a function of heterogeneity h for (b) chains with a fixed junction length Δ^ = 0.1 and varying stiffness and (c) chains with a fixed stiffness (N = 0.25) but varying junction length. Chains are assumed to start from an equilibrium distribution.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Enhancement in fracture rate for a heterogeneous vs homogeneous chain with free chain ends. The ratio of MFPT to fracture for a fully stiff chain (h = 1) vs a heterogeneous chain (h = 10) is plotted as a function of the cutoff energy. (a) Filaments with constant length N but varying junction size and stiffness. (b) Filaments with varying length but constant junction stiffness κ.

References

    1. Kausch H-H, Polymer fracture, volume 2, Springer Science & Business Media, 1987.
    1. Ward IM and Sweeney J, Mechanical properties of solid polymers, John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
    1. Zhou X et al., Science 348, 574 (2015). - PMC - PubMed
    1. van Gent DC, Hoeijmakers JH, and Kanaar R, Nat Rev Genet 2, 196 (2001). - PubMed
    1. Pollard TD and Borisy GG, Cell 112, 453 (2003). - PubMed