Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Feb;46(2):225-235.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-05929-3. Epub 2020 Jan 29.

Antimicrobial-associated harm in critical care: a narrative review

Affiliations
Review

Antimicrobial-associated harm in critical care: a narrative review

Nishkantha Arulkumaran et al. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

The belief that, for the individual patient, the benefit of prompt and continued use of antimicrobials outweighs any potential harm is a significant barrier to improved stewardship of these vital agents. Antimicrobial stewardship may be perceived as utilitarian rationing, seeking to preserve the availability of effective antimicrobials by limiting the development of resistance in a manner which could conflict with the immediate treatment of the patient in need. This view does not account for the growing evidence of antimicrobial-associated harm to individual patients. This review sets out the evidence for antimicrobial-associated harm and how this should be balanced with the need for prompt and appropriate therapy in infection. It describes the mechanisms by which antimicrobials may harm patients including: mitochondrial toxicity; immune cell toxicity; adverse drug reactions; selection of resistant organisms within a given patient; and disruption of the microbiome. Finally, the article indicates how the harms of antimicrobials may be mitigated and identifies areas for research and development in this field.

Keywords: Antibiotics; Antifungals; Critical care; Drug-related side effects and adverse reactions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

JL has received honoraria from Pfizer and MSD. All other authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Summary of the mechanisms by which antimicrobials may harm patients
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Antibiotics affect mitochondrial function by multiple mechanisms. Summary of findings from ex-vivo investigation. i Direct inhibition of mitochondrial complex (CI–CIV) activity results in the inability to maintain an electrochemical gradient. iiiii The loss of mitochondrial membrane potential decreases the ability of the cell to generate ATP. Impaired Complex I and Complex III function result in leak of electrons from the ETC into the matrix, which then allows reaction with oxygen to form the superoxide free radical (O2). iv Inability of Complex I to form ROS impairs NLRP3 activation; whereas excessive mitochondrial ROS enhances NLRP3 inflammasome activity. In health, superoxide is reduced to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) by superoxide dismutase (SOD). The hydrogen peroxide is further reduced to water (H2O) by catalase. v If excessive superoxide is produced, the anti-oxidant system is overwhelmed resulting in DNA oxidation and damage. vi Consequently, the ability of the cell to generate new mitochondria (mitochondrial biogenesis) is impaired. vii Additionally, ciprofloxacin is able to inhibit DNA topoisomerase, thereby interfering with mitochondrial DNA replication. viii Beta-lactams fit carriers for mitochondrial substrate uptake, causing reduced succinate uptake. Succinate is converted to fumarate which itself has potent antibacterial effects. C I Complex I, C II Complex II, C III Complex III, C IV Complex IV, C V Complex V/ ATP synthase, Cyt C Cytochrome C, FAD Flavin adenine dinucleotide, FAD Flavin adenine dinucleotide, H2O2 hydrogen peroxide, Q Co-enzyme Q, NAD nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, SOD superoxide dismutase, Ψ mitochondrial membrane potential
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Analysis of relative abundance changes prior to (sample A) and following broad spectrum antimicrobials (sample B), demonstrating an increase in Ascomycota, all of which identified as C. albicans, using One Codex (https://onecodex.com/) [92]

Comment in

  • Antibiotics in the ICU; benefit or harm?
    Hurley JC. Hurley JC. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Sep;46(9):1798-1799. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06060-z. Epub 2020 Apr 22. Intensive Care Med. 2020. PMID: 32322919 No abstract available.

References

    1. Vincent J-L, Rello J, Marshall J, et al. International study of the prevalence and outcomes of infection in intensive care units. JAMA. 2009;302(21):2323–2329. - PubMed
    1. Kollef Marin H. Inadequate Antimicrobial Treatment: An Important Determinant of Outcome for Hospitalized Patients. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2000;31(Supplement_4):S131–S138. - PubMed
    1. Kumar A, Roberts D, Wood KE, et al. Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(6):1589–1596. - PubMed
    1. de Jong E, van Oers JA, Beishuizen A, Infectious PVTL (2016) Efficacy and safety of procalcitonin guidance in reducing the duration of antibiotic treatment in critically ill patients: a randomised, controlled, open-label trial. Lancet Infect Dis 16(7):819–827 - PubMed
    1. Kett DH, Cano E, Quartin AA, et al. Implementation of guidelines for management of possible multidrug-resistant pneumonia in intensive care: an observational, multicentre cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2011;11(3):181–189. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances