Modification of tubular chitosan-based peripheral nerve implants: applications for simple or more complex approaches
- PMID: 31997801
- PMCID: PMC7059590
- DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.271668
Modification of tubular chitosan-based peripheral nerve implants: applications for simple or more complex approaches
Abstract
Surgical treatment of peripheral nerve injuries is still a major challenge in human clinic. Up to now, none of the well-developed microsurgical treatment options is able to guarantee a complete restoration of nerve function. This restriction is also effective for novel clinically approved artificial nerve guides. In this review, we compare surgical repair techniques primarily for digital nerve injuries reported with relatively high prevalence to be valuable attempts in clinical digital nerve repair and point out their advantages and shortcomings. We furthermore discuss the use of artificial nerve grafts with a focus on chitosan-based nerve guides, for which our own studies contributed to their approval for clinical use. In the second part of this review, very recent future perspectives for the enhancement of tubular (commonly hollow) nerve guides are discussed in terms of their clinical translatability and ability to form three-dimensional constructs that biomimick the natural nerve structure. This includes materials that have already shown their beneficial potential in in vivo studies like fibrous intraluminal guidance structures, hydrogels, growth factors, and approaches of cell transplantation. Additionally, we highlight upcoming future perspectives comprising co-application of stem cell secretome. From our overview, we conclude that already simple attempts are highly effective to increase the regeneration supporting properties of nerve guides in experimental studies. But for bringing nerve repair with bioartificial nerve grafts to the next level, e.g. repair of defects > 3 cm in human patients, more complex intraluminal guidance structures such as innovatively manufactured hydrogels and likely supplementation of stem cells or their secretome for therapeutic purposes may represent promising future perspectives.
Keywords: bioartificial nerve graft; biological nerve graft; cell transplantation; cellular products; luminal structures; peripheral nerve repair.
Conflict of interest statement
None
Figures
References
-
- Assmus H. Timing and Decision-Making in Peripheral Nerve Trauma. In: Haastert-Talini K, Assmus H, Antoniadis G, editors. Modern Concepts of Peripheral Nerve Repair. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2017. pp. 27–40.
-
- Battiston B, Tos P, Cushway TR, Geuna S. Nerve repair by means of vein filled with muscle grafts I Clinical results. Microsurgery. 2000;20:32–36. - PubMed
-
- Battiston B, Geuna S, Ferrero M, Tos P. Nerve repair by means of tubulization: literature review and personal clinical experience comparing biological and synthetic conduits for sensory nerve repair. Microsurgery. 2005;25:258–267. - PubMed
-
- Belanger K, Dinis TM, Taourirt S, Vidal G, Kaplan DL, Egles C. Recent strategies in tissue engineering for guided peripheral nerve regeneration. Macromol Biosci. 2016;16:472–481. - PubMed
-
- Bertleff MJ, Meek MF, Nicolai JP. A prospective clinical evaluation of biodegradable neurolac nerve guides for sensory nerve repair in the hand. J Hand Surg Am. 2005;30:513–518. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
