Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan 10:9:1495.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01495. eCollection 2019.

Prognosis of Patients With Testicular Carcinoma Is Dependent on Metastatic Site

Affiliations

Prognosis of Patients With Testicular Carcinoma Is Dependent on Metastatic Site

Peihang Xu et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: Existing data on the association of metastatic sites and prognosis of patients with metastatic testicular malignancy are limited. In this study, the association of survival outcome and the prognostic value of different metastatic sites in patients with metastatic testicular cancer was investigated. Methods: A dataset from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) survey was selected for a retrospective metastatic testicular cancer cohort study. Patients with different metastatic sites were divided into corresponding groups for further analysis. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test was implemented for comparison of the survival distribution of cases. Multivariate Cox regression models were then applied to analyze the association of distant metastases with survival for all selected patients and subgroup based on different histological type with a single metastatic site. Results: A total of 1,661 patients treated for metastatic testicular malignant tumors between 2010 to 2016 were enrolled in this cohort study. Upon initial diagnosis, 61.9, 15.2, 6.7, 6.4, and 36.2% of patients were found to have lung, liver, bone, brain, and distant lymph nodes metastatic sites, respectively. Patients with lung, liver, or bone metastases showed more undesirable prognosis for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS), in contrast with those with distant lymph node metastases (all P < 0.05). In comparison with patients with more than one metastatic site, those with a single metastasis had extended OS and CSS (both P < 0.001). In patients with a single metastatic site, Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox regression demonstrated the association of bone and liver with the worst two groups of OS and CSS. Multivariate Cox models based on histological type showed different prognostic values of metastases in patients with seminoma or non-seminomatous germ cell tumors. Conclusion: There is much heterogeneity in the oncological outcome of site-specific metastatic patients. Metastatic profiles and the prognostic value of metastases are dependent on the histological type in TC patients. Distant lymph nodes and lung metastases indicate favorable prognostic factors, while bone and liver metastases indicate negative survival outcomes in TC.

Keywords: SEER; metastatic site; metastatic testicular cancer; number of metastases; prognosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Venn diagram of the distribution of distant metastatic sites in the overall cohort.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier curves of overall survival and cancer-specific survival in patients with liver (A,B), lung (C,D), and bone (E,F) metastases vs. patients with distant lymph node metastasis.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan-Meier curves of overall survival (A) and cancer-specific survival (B) according to the number of metastatic sites.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan-Meier curves of overall survival (A) and cancer-specific survival (B) according to the site of metastasis in patients with a single metastatic site.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Kaplan-Meier curves of overall survival and cancer-specific survival in patients with seminoma (A,B) and non-seminomatous germ cell tumor (C,D) according to the site of metastasis in patients with a single metastatic site.

References

    1. Bosl GJ, Motzer RJ. Testicular germ-cell cancer. N Engl J Med. (1997) 337:242–53. 10.1056/NEJM199707243370406 - DOI - PubMed
    1. La Vecchia C, Bosetti C, Lucchini F, Bertuccio P, Negri E, Boyle P, et al. Cancer mortality in Europe, 2000-2004, and an overview of trends since 1975. Ann Oncol. (2010) 21:1323–60. 10.1093/annonc/mdp530 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rosen A, Jayram G, Drazer M, Eggener SE. Global trends in testicular cancer incidence and mortality. Eur Urol. (2011) 60:374–9. 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. (2019) 69:7–34. 10.3322/caac.21551 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nigam M, Aschebrook-Kilfoy B, Shikanov S, Eggener S. Increasing incidence of testicular cancer in the United States and Europe between 1992 and 2009. World J Urol. (2015) 33:623–31. 10.1007/s00345-014-1361-y - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources