Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov 20:9:100473.
doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100473. eCollection 2019 Dec.

Developing and testing measures of reproductive decision-making agency in Nepal

Laura Hinson  1 , Jeffrey Edmeades  2 , Lydia Murithi  3 , Mahesh Puri  4
Affiliations

Developing and testing measures of reproductive decision-making agency in Nepal

Laura Hinson et al. SSM Popul Health. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Conceptual ambiguity in how we define reproductive empowerment has left the field with inconclusive evidence of its relationship to key reproductive outcomes. Our study aimed to develop and test a measure of reproductive decision-making agency, which is a critical component of reproductive empowerment, in a sample of married women from two Nepalese districts. Initial measures were developed based on theory and previous literature. Next, we used cognitive interviewing techniques to explore local meanings of reproductive empowerment and decision making through eight focus group discussions and 24 in-depth interviews. This process resulted in four core questions used to assess decision making across three domains of reproductive behavior: when to have children, whether to use family planning, and which family planning method to use. We combined these questions to develop an overall assessment of decision-making agency. These measures were included in a quantitative survey conducted with 1000 women, split evenly between the two districts. The combined measure of overall reproductive decision-making agency was internally consistent across the three domains examined (Cronbach's alpha = 0.6416), performed well across a range of validity assessments, including those aimed at assessing construct and criterion validity, and was predictive of a range of reproductive outcomes, particularly those related to feelings of reproductive control. The results suggest that the measures developed here provide insight into the nuances of joint versus sole decision making beyond those provided by standard measures. With better measures of reproductive agency, we can better design interventions for men and women, to meet their reproductive needs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of four key outcomes by level of reproductive health decision-making agency, Nepal 2017 (reference category: Low agency) *P < .1; **P < .05; ***P < .01.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Basnyat I., Dutta M.J. Reframing motherhood through the culture-centered approach: Articulations of agency among young Nepalese women. Health Communication. 2012;27(3):273–283. - PubMed
    1. Edmeades J.C., Mejia J.P., Sebany M. International Center for Research on Women; Washington D.C.: 2018. Reproductive empowerment: A conceptual framework and measurement Review. (in press)
    1. van Eerdewijk A., Wong F., Vaast C., Newton J., Tyszler M., Pennington A. Royal Tropical Institute (KIT); Amsterdam: 2017. White paper: A conceptual model of women and girls' empowerment.
    1. James-Hawkins L., Peters C., VanderEnd K., Bardin L., Yount K.M. Women's agency and its relationship to current contraceptive use in lower-and middle-income countries: A systematic review of the literature. Global Public Health. 2016:1–16. - PubMed
    1. Kabeer N. Discussing women's empowerment: Theory and practice. SIDA: Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency; Stockholm: 2001. Reflections on the measurement of women's empowerment.

LinkOut - more resources