Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2020 Jan 30;20(1):7.
doi: 10.1186/s12873-020-0302-x.

Patient characteristics, triage utilisation, level of care, and outcomes in an unselected adult patient population seen by the emergency medical services: a prospective observational study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Patient characteristics, triage utilisation, level of care, and outcomes in an unselected adult patient population seen by the emergency medical services: a prospective observational study

Carl Magnusson et al. BMC Emerg Med. .

Abstract

Background: Crowding in the emergency department (ED) is a safety concern, and pathways to bypass the ED have been introduced to reduce the time to definitive care. Conversely, a number of low-acuity patients in the ED could be assessed by the emergency medical services (EMS) as requiring a lower level of care. The limited access to primary care in Sweden leaves the EMS nurse to either assess the patient as requiring the ED or to stay at the scene. This study aimed to assess patient characteristics and evaluate the initial assessment by and utilisation of the ambulance triage system and the appropriateness of non-transport decisions.

Methods: A prospective observational study including 6712 patients aged ≥16 years was conducted. The patient records with 72 h of follow-up for non-transported patients were reviewed. Outcomes of death, time-critical conditions, complications within 48 h and final hospital assessment were evaluated. The Mann-Whitney U test, Fisher's exact test, and Spearman's rank correlation were used for statistical analysis.

Results: The median patient age was 66 years, and the most common medical history was a circulatory diagnosis. Males received a higher priority from dispatchers and were more frequently assessed at the scene as requiring hospital care. A total of 1312 patients (19.7%) were non-transported; a history of psychiatric disorders or no medical history was more commonly noted among these patients. Twelve (0.9%) of the 1312 patients not transported were later admitted with time-critical conditions. Full triage was applied in 77.4% of the cases, and older patients were triaged at the scene as an 'unspecific condition' more frequently than younger patients. Overall, the 30-day mortality was 4.1% (n = 274).

Conclusions: Age, sex, medical history, and presentation all appear to influence the initial assessment. A number of patients transported to ED could be managed at a lower level of care. A small proportion of the non-transported patients were later diagnosed with a time-critical condition, warranting improved assessment tools at the scene and education of the personnel focusing on the elderly population. These results may be useful in addressing resource allocation issues aiming at increasing patient safety.

Keywords: Emergency medical services; Non-transport; Patient assessment; Patient safety; Prehospital; Triage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of the studied patients, and the distribution of patient assessment

References

    1. Berg L, Ehrenberg A, Florin J, Östergren J, Göransson K. Significant changes in emergency department length of stay and case mix over eight years at a large swedish university hospital. Int Emerg Nurs. 2019;43:50–55. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2018.08.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lindström V, Bohm K, Kurland L. Prehospital care in sweden. Notfall + Rettungsmedizin. 2015;18:107–109. doi: 10.1007/s10049-015-1989-1. - DOI
    1. Tärnqvist J, Dahlén E, Norberg G, Magnusson C, Herlitz J, Strömsöe A, et al. On-scene and final assessments and their interrelationship among patients who use the ems on multiple occasions. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017;32:528–535. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X17006458. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dinh MM, Berendsen Russell S, Bein KJ, Chalkley DR, Muscatello D, Paoloni R, et al. Statewide retrospective study of low acuity emergency presentations in new south wales, Australia: who, what, where and why? BMJ Open. 2016;6:e010964. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010964. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nagree Y, Camarda VJ, Fatovich DM, Cameron PA, Dey I, Gosbell AD, et al. Quantifying the proportion of general practice and low-acuity patients in the emergency department. Med J Aust. 2013;198:612–615. doi: 10.5694/mja12.11754. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms