Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan 30;20(1):138.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8228-5.

Life satisfaction and mental health among transgender students in Norway

Affiliations

Life satisfaction and mental health among transgender students in Norway

Norman Anderssen et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Social attitudes to transgender persons and other gender minorities vary around the world, and in many cultures, prejudices and social stigma are common. Consequently, transgender persons face challenges related to discrimination and negative attitudes among the public. The purpose of this study was to compare life satisfaction, loneliness, mental health, and suicidal behavior among transgender students with cisgender students' experiences in a nationwide sample of Norwegian students pursuing higher education.

Methods: In total,50,054 full-time Norwegian students completed an online questionnaire (response rate 30.8%), of whom 15,399 were cisgender males, 34,437 cisgender females, 28 individuals who reported being binary transgender (12 transwomen and 16 transmen), and 69 individuals non-binary transgender persons. The measures included questions concerning gender identity, life satisfaction (Satisfaction With Life Scale), loneliness (The Three-Item Loneliness Scale), mental health problems (Hopkins Symptoms Check List), mental disorders, and suicidal ideation, suicidal behavior, and self-harm. Chi-square tests, Independent-Samples Kruskal-Wallis tests, and logistic regression analyses were used to examine differences between gender identities.

Results: Transgender students reported significantly more psychosocial burdens on all measures. There were no significant differences in any of the measures between the binary and non-binary transgender students.

Conclusion: The findings call for increased awareness about welfare and health for transgender students in Norway. Higher education institutions need to consider measures at various levels to establish a learning environment that is more inclusive for gender minorities.

Keywords: Binary; Gender incongruence; Gender minority; Loneliness; Mental health; Non-binary; Students; Suicidal behavior; Transgender.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Prevalence of poor life satisfaction (in bars) stratified by gender identity. Lines indicate continuous SWLS sum scores. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. SWLS=Satisfaction With Life Scale. Significant gender group differences are indicated for each row in the table using subscript letters, calculated at the .05 significance level
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Prevalence of loneliness (“often” or “very often”) stratified by gender identity. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Significant gender group differences are indicated for each row in the table using subscript letters, calculated at the .05 significance level
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Prevalence of mental health problems (in bars) stratified by gender identity. Lines indicate HSCL average scores. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. HSCL-25 = Hopkins Symptoms Checklist-25. Significant gender group differences are indicated for each row in the table using subscript letters, calculated at the .05 significance level
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Prevalence of lifetime self-harm, self-harm thoughts, suicide attempts, and suicide thoughts, stratified by gender identity. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Significant gender group differences are indicated for each row in the table using subscript letters, calculated at the .05 significance level

References

    1. Coleman E, Bockting W, Botzer M, Cohen-Kettenis P, Decuypere G, Feldman J, et al. Standards of care for the health of transsexual, transgender, and gender-nonconforming people, version 7. Int J Transgend. 2012;13(4):165–232. doi: 10.1080/15532739.2011.700873. - DOI
    1. Liszewski W, Peebles JK, Yeung H, Arron S. Persons of nonbinary gender — awareness, visibility, and health disparities. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(25):2391–2393. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1812005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights - FRA. Being trans in the European Union - Comparative analysis of EU LGBT survey data. European Commission; 2014.
    1. Norton A, Herek G. Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward transgender people: findings from a national probability sample of U.S. adults. Sex Roles. 2013;68(11):738–753. doi: 10.1007/s11199-011-0110-6. - DOI
    1. Testa RJ, Habarth J, Peta J, Balsam K, Bockting W, Gonsiorek JC. Development of the gender minority stress and resilience measure. Psych Sex Orientat Gend Divers. 2015;2(1):65–77. doi: 10.1037/sgd0000081. - DOI