Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2020 Jan 7;9(1):1710389.
doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2019.1710389. eCollection 2020.

Evaluating the role of FAMIly history of cancer and diagnosis of multiple neoplasms in cancer patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors: the multicenter FAMI-L1 study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Evaluating the role of FAMIly history of cancer and diagnosis of multiple neoplasms in cancer patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors: the multicenter FAMI-L1 study

Alessio Cortellini et al. Oncoimmunology. .

Abstract

Background: We investigate the role of family history of cancer (FHC) and diagnosis of metachronous and/or synchronous multiple neoplasms (MN), during anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy. Design: This was a multicenter retrospective study of advanced cancer patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy. FHC was collected in lineal and collateral lines, and patients were categorized as follows: FHC-high (in case of cancer diagnoses in both the lineal and collateral family lines), FHC-low (in case of cancer diagnoses in only one family line), and FHC-negative. Patients were also categorized according to the diagnosis of MN as follows: MN-high (>2 malignancies), MN-low (two malignancies), and MN-negative. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of any grade were evaluated. Results: 822 consecutive patients were evaluated. 458 patients (55.7%) were FHC-negative, 289 (35.2%) were FHC-low, and 75 (9.1%) FHC-high, respectively. 29 (3.5%) had a diagnosis of synchronous MN and 94 (11.4%) of metachronous MN. 108 (13.2%) and 15 (1.8%) patients were MN-low and MN-high, respectively. The median follow-up was 15.6 months. No significant differences were found regarding ORR among subgroups. FHC-high patients had a significantly longer PFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.69 [95% CI: 0.48-0.97], p = .0379) and OS (HR = 0.61 [95% CI: 0.39-0.93], p = .0210), when compared to FHC-negative patients. FHC-high was confirmed as an independent predictor for PFS and OS at multivariate analysis. No significant differences were found according to MN categories. FHC-high patients had a significantly higher incidence of irAEs of any grade, compared to FHC-negative patients (p = .0012). Conclusions: FHC-high patients seem to benefit more than FHC-negative patients from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors.

Keywords: DDR genes; Family history of cancer; PD-1; immune checkpoint inhibitors; immunotherapy; multiple neoplasms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Kaplan–Meier survival curves according to FHC. (a) Progression-free survival. FHC-negative: 9.3 months (95% CI: 7.5–10.6; 277 events); FHC-low: 8.4 months (95% CI: 7–11.4; 166 events); FHC-high: 20.5 months (95% CI: 8.7–26.4; 36 events). (b) Overall survival. FHC-negative: 18.2 months (95% CI: 14.9–23.9; 250 censored patients); FHC-low: 20.8 months (95% CI: 15.4–20.9; 176 censored patients); FHC-high: 31.6 months (95% CI: 26.2–31.6; 51 censored patients).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Kaplan–Meier survival curves according to MN. (a) Progression-free survival. MN-negative: 8.7 months (95% CI: 7.6–10.2; 414 events); MN-low: 12.3 months (95% CI: 8.3–28.9; 58 events); MN-high: 14.4 months (95% CI: 3.6–14.5; 7 events). (b) Overall survival. MN-negative: 20.5 months (95% CI: 15.7–27.1; 43 censored patients); MN-low: 26.2 months (95% CI: 18.7–48.9; 66 censored patients); MN-high: 15.9 months (95% CI: 10.5–15.9; 8 censored patients).

References

    1. Taube JM, Klein A, Brahmer JR, Xu H, Pan X, Kim JH, Chen L, Pardoll DM, Topalian SL, Anders RA, et al. Association of PD-1, PD-1 ligands, and other features of the tumor immune microenvironment with response to anti-PD-1 therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(19):5064–10. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-3271. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rizvi NA, Hellmann MD, Snyder A, Kvistborg P, Makarov V, Havel JJ, Lee W, Yuan J, Wong P, Ho TS.. Mutational landscape determines sensitivity to PD-1 blockade in non–small cell lung cancer. Science. 2015;348(6230):124–128. doi:10.1126/science.aaa1348. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hellmann MD, Ciuleanu T-E, Pluzanski A, Lee JS, Otterson GA, Audigier-Valette C, Minenza E, Linardou H, Burgers S, Salman P, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in lung cancer with a high tumor mutational burden. N Engl J Med. 2018. May 31;378(22):2093–2104. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1801946. Epub 2018 Apr 16. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cortellini A, Bersanelli M, Buti S, Cannita K, Santini D, Perrone F, Giusti R, Tiseo M, Michiara M, Di Marino P, et al. A multicenter study of body mass index in cancer patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors: when overweight becomes favorable. J Immuno Ther Cancer. 2019. February 27;7(1):57. doi:10.1186/s40425-019-0527-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Routy B, Le Chatelier E, Derosa L, Duong CPM, Alou MT, Daillère R, Fluckiger A, Messaoudene M, Rauber C, Roberti MP, et al. Gut microbiome influences efficacy of PD-1-based immunotherapy against epithelial tumors. Science. 2018. January 5;359(6371):91–97. doi:10.1126/science.aan3706. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances