Factors associated with diagnostic accuracy, technical success and adverse events of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 32003100
- DOI: 10.1111/jgh.14999
Factors associated with diagnostic accuracy, technical success and adverse events of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background and aim: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) is used to diagnose lesions within or adjacent to the digestive tract. However, there is no report on the overall diagnostic accuracy, technical success, and adverse events of FNB. The aims of this study were to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to comprehensively assess the diagnostic accuracy, technical success, and adverse events of FNB.
Methods: Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant articles published in English from January 1998 to May 2019 (No. CRD42019141647). Primary outcomes were EUS-FNB related diagnostic accuracy rate, technical success rate, and adverse event rate.
Results: A total of 51 articles including 5330 patients met our criteria. The overall EUS-FNB related diagnostic accuracy rate, technical success rate, and adverse event rate was 90.82% [95% confidence interval (CI) 88.69-92.76%], 99.71% [95% CI 99.35-99.93%], and 0.59% [95% CI 0.29-1.0%], respectively. Biopsy with 22G needle could increase the diagnostic accuracy rate and technical success rate to 92.17% [95% CI 89.32-94.61%] and 99.88% [95% CI 99.64-99.99%], respectively, and decrease the adverse event to 0.37% [95% CI 0.08-0.87%]. Moreover, it showed that 22G needle was an independent factor associated with a higher diagnostic accuracy rate and technical success rate and a lower adverse event rate (P = 0.04, P < 0.001, and P = 0.04, respectively) by univariate and multivariate meta-regression analyses.
Conclusion: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy is a feasible and safe procedure for lesions within or adjacent to the digestive tract. Biopsy using 22G needle could increase the diagnostic accuracy rate and technical success rate and decrease adverse event rate during the FNB procedure.
Keywords: FNB; adverse event rate; diagnostic accuracy rate; technical success rate.
© 2020 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.BMC Gastroenterol. 2015 Sep 29;15:122. doi: 10.1186/s12876-015-0352-9. BMC Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 26419845 Free PMC article.
-
Adverse events of 20-22G second-generation endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy needles for solid lesions in the upper gastrointestinal tract and adjacent organs: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Dig Endosc. 2025 May;37(5):490-500. doi: 10.1111/den.14972. Epub 2025 Jan 9. Dig Endosc. 2025. PMID: 39789825
-
Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study.Surg Endosc. 2018 Aug;32(8):3533-3539. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6075-6. Epub 2018 Feb 5. Surg Endosc. 2018. PMID: 29404729 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A Meta-Analysis Comparing Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Aspiration With Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Biopsy.J Clin Gastroenterol. 2022 Sep 1;56(8):668-678. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001702. Epub 2022 Apr 14. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2022. PMID: 35470294
-
Efficacy, Feasibility, and Safety of Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.J Clin Gastroenterol. 2022 Jul 1;56(6):e283-e292. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001680. Epub 2022 Feb 28. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2022. PMID: 35220377
Cited by
-
Preclinical models derived from endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for individualized treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jan 5;9:934974. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.934974. eCollection 2022. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023. PMID: 36687406 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of tumor type and size on macroscopic tissue core retrieval in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy for pancreatic malignancies.BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Nov 19;24(1):415. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03517-z. BMC Gastroenterol. 2024. PMID: 39563255 Free PMC article.
-
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Sampling for Personalized Pancreatic Cancer Treatment.Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Mar 8;11(3):469. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11030469. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33800161 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Endoscopy in patients on antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy: British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline update.Gut. 2021 Sep;70(9):1611-1628. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-325184. Gut. 2021. PMID: 34362780 Free PMC article.
-
Device malfunctions with use of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy devices: Analysis of the MAUDE database.Endosc Ultrasound. 2023 Sep-Oct;12(5):424-427. doi: 10.1097/eus.0000000000000016. Epub 2023 Aug 12. Endosc Ultrasound. 2023. PMID: 37969167 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ribeiro A, Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Wiersema LM, Wang KK, Clain JE, Wiersema MJ. EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration combined with flow cytometry and immunocytochemistry in the diagnosis of lymphoma. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2001; 53: 485-491.
-
- Mesa H, Stelow EB, Stanley MW, Mallery S, Lai R, Bardales RH. Diagnosis of nonprimary pancreatic neoplasms by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2004; 31: 313-318.
-
- Iglesias-Garcia J, Poley JW, Larghi A et al. Feasibility and yield of a new EUS histology needle: results from a multicenter, pooled, cohort study. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2011; 73: 1189-1196.
-
- Larghi A, Iglesias-Garcia J, Poley JW et al. Feasibility and yield of a novel 22-gauge histology EUS needle in patients with pancreatic masses: a multicenter prospective cohort study. Surg. Endosc. 2013; 27: 3733-3738.
-
- Polkowski M, Jenssen C, Kaye P et al. Technical aspects of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline - March 2017. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 989-1006.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- No.2018A0303100024/Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province
- No. 81502040/National Natural Science Foundation of China
- No. JCYJ20150403101028164/Technical Research and Development Project of Shenzhen
- No. SYLY201718, SYJY201714 and SYLY201801/Three Engineering Training Funds in Shenzhen
- SZXJ2017030/Shenzhen Health Planning Commission
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous