Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Apr;26(2):129-136.
doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000695.

Minimally invasive surgery for intracerebral hemorrhage

Affiliations
Review

Minimally invasive surgery for intracerebral hemorrhage

Jeffrey R Vitt et al. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2020 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is common, associated with a high degree of mortality and long-term functional impairment, and remains without effective proven treatments. Surgical hematoma evacuation can reduce mass effect and decrease cytotoxic effects from blood product breakdown. However, results from large clinical trials that have examined the role of open craniotomy have not demonstrated a significant outcome benefit over medical management. We review the data on minimally invasive surgery (MIS) that is emerging as a treatment modality for spontaneous ICH.

Recent findings: The use of MIS for supratentorial ICH has increased significantly in recent years and appears to be associated with decreased mortality and improved functional outcome compared with medical management. The role of MIS for posterior fossa ICH is ill-defined. Currently available MIS devices allow for stereotactic aspiration and thrombolysis, endoport-mediated evacuation, and endoscopic aspiration. Clinical series demonstrate that MIS can facilitate significant hematoma volume reduction and may be associated with less morbidity than conventional open surgical approaches.

Summary: MIS is an appealing treatment modality for supratentorial ICH and with careful patient selection and technologic advances has the potential to improve neurologic outcomes and reduce mortality. Early and extensive hematoma evacuation are important therapeutic targets and current studies are underway that have the potential to change the management for ICH patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. van Asch CJ, Luitse MJ, Rinkel GJ, et al. Incidence, case fatality, and functional outcome of intracerebral haemorrhage over time, according to age, sex, and ethnic origin: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol 2010; 9:167–176.
    1. Poon MT, Fonville AF, Al-Shahi Salman R. Long-term prognosis after intracerebral haemorrhage: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2014; 85:660–667.
    1. Dennis MS. Outcome after brain haemorrhage. Cerebrovasc Dis 2003; 16: (Suppl 1): 9–13.
    1. Moullaali TJ, Wang X, Martin RH, et al. Blood pressure control and clinical outcomes in acute intracerebral haemorrhage: a preplanned pooled analysis of individual participant data. Lancet Neurol 2019; 18:857–864.
    1. Steiner T, Poli S, Griebe M, et al. Fresh frozen plasma versus prothrombin complex concentrate in patients with intracranial haemorrhage related to vitamin K antagonists (INCH): a randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 2016; 15:566–573.

LinkOut - more resources