Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Jan 31;20(1):17.
doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-0879-y.

The tumour response of postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive breast cancers undergoing different types of neoadjuvant therapy: a meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

The tumour response of postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive breast cancers undergoing different types of neoadjuvant therapy: a meta-analysis

Yaling Wang et al. BMC Womens Health. .

Abstract

Background: To investigate the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT), neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) and neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy (NCET) on the tumour response, including pathological complete response (pCR) rate and overall response rate (ORR), in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer.

Methods: Based on a PRISMA-IPD statement, the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were used to identify eligible trials published from inception to 7 May 2019. Pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidential interval (CI) was calculated to assess the pCR rate and ORR of tumours among those three treatments via fixed- or random-effect Mantel-Haenszel models in terms of a Heterogeneity Chi2 test with a significant level of p < 0.1. All statistical tests were performed by the software of StataSE, version 12.0.

Results: The analysed data consisted of 10 eligible clinical trials with 971 unique HR-positive breast cancer patients. The pooled results indicated that the pCR rate of those patients undergoing NET was significantly lower than those undergoing NCT (pooled OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.26-0.90), whereas the difference of ORR between both therapies was not statistically significant (pooled OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.73-1.52). The combined paradigm of NCET compared with the monotherapy of NET or NCT did not present a significantly improved pCR rate or ORR (pooled OR, 2.61; 95% CI, 0.94-7.25; and 2.25; 95% CI, 0.39-13.05; respectively).

Conclusion: Postmenopausal HR-positive breast cancer patients after NCT may have better tumour response than those after NET, while those undergoing NCET may not manifest the apparently improved clinical efficacies compared to those receiving monotherapy.

Keywords: Breast cancer; Neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy; Tumour response.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The PRISMA flow diagram of the inclusion process. Abbreviations; NCET, neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy; NCT, neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The pCR rate and ORR of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Abbreviations: NET, neoadjuvant endocrine therapy; NCT, neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The pCR rate and ORR of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy vs neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy. Abbreviations: NET, neoadjuvant endocrine therapy; NCET, neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The judgements of risk of bias summary and risk of bias graph

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hortobagyi GN, Ames FC, Buzdar AU, et al. Management of stage III primary breast cancer with primary chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation therapy. Cancer. 1988;62(12):2507–2516. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19881215)62:12<2507::AID-CNCR2820621210>3.0.CO;2-D. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wolmark N, Wang J, Mamounas E, Bryant J, Fisher B. Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer: nine-year results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and bowel project B-18. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2001;30:96–102. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a003469. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mauri D, Pavlidis N, Ioannidis JP. Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(3):188–194. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fisher B, Brown A, Mamounas E, et al. Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on local-regional disease in women with operable breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and bowel project B-18. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15(7):2483–2493. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.7.2483. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Toi M, Nakamura S, Kuroi K, et al. Phase II study of preoperative sequential FEC and docetaxel predicts of pathological response and disease free survival. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;110(3):531–539. doi: 10.1007/s10549-007-9744-z. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances