Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2020 Jan 31;15(1):28.
doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-1465-z.

Improving quality of care and clinical outcomes for rectal cancer through clinical audits in a multicentre cancer care organisation

M G Torras  1 , E Canals  2 , C Muñoz-Montplet  3 , A Vidal  4 , D Jurado  3 , A Eraso  2 , S Villà  5 , M Caro  5 , J Molero  3 , M Macià  6 , M Puigdemont  7 , E González-Muñoz  4 , A López  8 , F Guedea  9 , J M Borras  10
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Improving quality of care and clinical outcomes for rectal cancer through clinical audits in a multicentre cancer care organisation

M G Torras et al. Radiat Oncol. .

Abstract

Introduction: Colorectal cancer treatment requires a complex, multidisciplinary approach. Because of the potential variability, monitoring through clinical audits is advisable. This study assesses the effects of a quality improvement action plan in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and treated with radiotherapy.

Methods: Comparative, multicentre study in two cohorts of 120 patients each, selected randomly from patients diagnosed with rectal cancer who had initiated radiotherapy with a curative intent. Based on the results from a baseline clinical audit in 2013, a quality improvement action plan was designed and implemented; a second audit in 2017 evaluated its impact.

Results: Standardised information was present on 77.5% of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) staging reports. Treatment strategies were similar in all three study centres. Of the patients whose treatment was interrupted, just 9.7% received a compensation dose. There was an increase in MRI re-staging from 32.5 to 61.5%, and a significant decrease in unreported circumferential resection margins following neoadjuvant therapy (ypCRM), from 34.5 to 5.6% (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The comparison between two clinical audits showed improvements in neoadjuvant radiotherapy in rectal cancer patients. Some indicators reveal areas in need of additional efforts, for example to reduce the overall treatment time.

Keywords: Clinical audit; Clinical practice variability; Improvement Quality process; Radiotherapy process; Rectal Cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vernet R, Borras JM, Aliste L, Antonio M, Guarga A, Manchon-Walsh P. Influence of age on variation in patterns of care in patients with rectal cancer in Catalonia (Spain) Clin Transl Oncol. 2018;20:1538. doi: 10.1007/s12094-018-1882-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J, Rosso S, Coebergh JW, Comber H, Forman D, Bray F. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:1374–1403. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.12.027. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rich T, Gunderson LL, Lew R, Galdibini JJ, Cohen AM, Donaldson G. Patterns of recurrence of rectal cancer after potentially curative surgery. Cancer. 1983;52:1317–1329. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19831001)52:7<1317::AID-CNCR2820520731>3.0.CO;2-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, Putter H, Steup WH, Wiggers T. Et Al. preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(9):638–646. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa010580. - DOI - PubMed
    1. MacFarlane JK, Ryall RD, Heald RJ. Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet. 1993;341:457–460. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90207-W. - DOI - PubMed