Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2020 Jan 31;21(1):39.
doi: 10.1186/s12882-020-1706-2.

Urgent start peritoneal dialysis: are we there yet?

Affiliations
Editorial

Urgent start peritoneal dialysis: are we there yet?

Keiko I Greenberg et al. BMC Nephrol. .

Abstract

The use of peritoneal dialysis (PD) has increased substantially in the United States (US) in the past decade. This was likely spurred in large part by the implementation of the expanded prospective payment system for the Medicare End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) program in 2011. Over the same period, there has also been growing interest in urgent start PD, which is commonly defined as initiation of PD within 14 days of catheter insertion. Ye and colleagues recently reported their experience with urgent start PD in 2059 Chinese ESRD patients over a 9-year period. Rates of complications, including peri-catheter leaks and peritonitis, were very low despite initiation of PD immediately after open catheter placement via open laparotomy in nearly all patients. Long term technique survival was good, with only 75 patients developing catheter failure. This study provides further evidence to suggest that urgent start PD is feasible and effective, although the generalizability of these results to Western populations is unclear. Recent proposed changes to the payment models in the Medicare ESRD program, designed to incentivize use of kidney transplantation and home dialysis, are likely to further propel growth of PD and urgent start PD in the US. Further studies are needed to optimize use of urgent PD and patient outcomes.

Keywords: Complications; Peritoneal dialysis; Peritonitis; Technique failure; Urgent start.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Bernard G Jaar is a member of the Editorial Board and Section Editor of BMC Nephrology. In addition, the section Editor was independent of the peer review and editorial process.

Comment on

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Briggs V, Davies S, Wilkie M. International variations in peritoneal dialysis utilization and implications for practice. Am J Kidney Dis. 2019;74:101–110. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.12.033. - DOI - PubMed
    1. United States Renal Data System . 2018 USRDS annual data report: Epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. Bethesda: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 2018.
    1. Ghaffari A, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Lee J, Maddux F, Moran J, Nissenson A. PD first: peritoneal dialysis as the default transition to dialysis therapy. Semin Dial. 2013;26(6):706–713. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12125. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blake PG, Jain AK. Urgent Start Peritoneal Dialysis: Defining What It Is and Why It Matters. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018;13(8):1278–1279. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02820318. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berns JS. A survey-based evaluation of self-perceived competency after nephrology fellowship training. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5(3):490–496. doi: 10.2215/CJN.08461109. - DOI - PMC - PubMed