Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan 31;20(1):39.
doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-2459-y.

Defining cognitive and functional profiles in schizophrenia and affective disorders

Yu-Chi Huang  1 , Yu Lee  1 , Chun-Yi Lee  1 , Pao-Yen Lin  1 , Chi-Fa Hung  1 , Sheng-Yu Lee  2   3   4 , Liang-Jen Wang  5
Affiliations

Defining cognitive and functional profiles in schizophrenia and affective disorders

Yu-Chi Huang et al. BMC Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Background: Neurocognitive dysfunction is a common symptom of various major psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia, major depressive disorder (MDD), and bipolar I disorder (BD). In this study, we investigated whether cognitive profiles and daily skill functioning could effectively differentiate between patients with schizophrenia, MDD, and BD.

Method: In this cross-sectional study, we recruited a total of 63 patients with schizophrenia, 55 patients with MDD, 43 patients with BD, and 92 healthy control subjects. We evaluated participants' cognitive functions and functional capacity using the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS) and the UCSD Performance-based Skills Assessment, Brief Version (UPSA-B), respectively. Multivariate analysis of covariance was then adopted to determine inter-group differences in BACS and UPSA-B performance.

Results: The BACS was capable of differentiating patients with a major psychiatric disorder (schizophrenia, MDD, and BD) from healthy subjects. Furthermore, schizophrenia patients had poorer motor speed performance than patients with affective disorders. The UPSA-B, particularly the financial portion, was able to distinguish schizophrenia patients from other groups. However, we did not observe any differences in UPSA-B performance between patients with mood disorders and the healthy controls. No significant difference between patients with BD and those with MDD were observed in either cognitive function or in functional capacity. The performances of the BACS and the UPSA-B were positively correlated, particularly in the MDD group.

Conclusion: Considering overall performance, the BACS and the UPSA-B characterize different endophenotyping profiles in the aforementioned four participant groups. Therefore, the results support the need for comprehensive assessments that target both cognitive function and functional capacity for patients with major psychiatric disorders.

Keywords: Daily skill functioning; Depression; Mania; Neurocognitive tests; Schizophrenia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The six domains of the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS) across patients with schizophrenia (SZ), patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), patients with bipolar I disorders (BD), and healthy control subjects (HC). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The three domains of the UCSD Performance-based Skills Assessment, Brief Version (UPSA-B) across patients with schizophrenia (SZ), patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), patients with bipolar I disorders (BD), and healthy control subjects (HC). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Harvey PD, Bowie CR, Friedman JI. Cognition in schizophrenia. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2001;3(5):423–428. doi: 10.1007/s11920-996-0038-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bourne C, Aydemir O, Balanza-Martinez V, Bora E, Brissos S, Cavanagh JT, Clark L, Cubukcuoglu Z, Dias VV, Dittmann S, et al. Neuropsychological testing of cognitive impairment in euthymic bipolar disorder: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2013;128(3):149–162. doi: 10.1111/acps.12133. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rock PL, Roiser JP, Riedel WJ, Blackwell AD. Cognitive impairment in depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2014;44(10):2029–2040. doi: 10.1017/S0033291713002535. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kitchen H, Rofail D, Heron L, Sacco P. Cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia: a review of the humanistic burden. Adv Ther. 2012;29(2):148–162. doi: 10.1007/s12325-012-0001-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bortolato B, Miskowiak KW, Kohler CA, Vieta E, Carvalho AF. Cognitive dysfunction in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia: a systematic review of meta-analyses. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015;11:3111–3125. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types