Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2020 Jan;51(1):69-84.
doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2019.05.002. Epub 2019 May 14.

Using a Smartphone App and Clinician Portal to Enhance Brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Childhood Anxiety Disorders

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Using a Smartphone App and Clinician Portal to Enhance Brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Childhood Anxiety Disorders

Jennifer S Silk et al. Behav Ther. 2020 Jan.

Abstract

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an efficacious treatment for child anxiety disorders, but 40%-50% of youth do not respond fully to treatment, and time commitments for standard CBT can be prohibitive for some families and lead to long waiting lists for trained CBT therapists in the community. SmartCAT 2.0 is an adjunctive mobile health program designed to improve and shorten CBT treatment for anxiety disorders in youth by providing them with the opportunity to practice CBT skills outside of session using an interactive and gamified interface. It consists of an app and an integrated clinician portal connected to the app for secure 2-way communication with the therapist. The goal of the present study was to evaluate SmartCAT 2.0 in an open trial to establish usability, feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of brief (8 sessions) CBT combined with SmartCAT. We also explored changes in CBT skills targeted by the app. Participants were 34 youth (ages 9-14) who met DSM-5 criteria for generalized, separation, and/or social anxiety disorder. Results demonstrated strong feasibility and usability of the app/portal and high satisfaction with the intervention. Youth used the app an average of 12 times between each therapy session (M = 5.8 mins per day). At posttreatment, 67% of youth no longer met diagnostic criteria for an anxiety disorder, with this percentage increasing to 86% at 2-month follow-up. Youth showed reduced symptom severity over time across raters and also improved from pre- to posttreatment in CBT skills targeted by the app, demonstrating better emotion identification and thought challenging and reductions in avoidance. Findings support the feasibility of combining brief CBT with SmartCAT. Although not a controlled trial, when benchmarked against the literature, the current findings suggest that SmartCAT may enhance the utility of brief CBT for childhood anxiety disorders.

Keywords: child anxiety treatment; cognitive behavioral therapy; ecological momentary intervention; mobile health; smartphone.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1a
Figure 1a
Skills Coach Screens
Figure 1b
Figure 1b
Interactive Skill-Builder Games

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Psychiatric Association, A. P. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, D.C.: Author.
    1. Barrett PM, Rapee RM, Dadds MM, & Ryan SM (1996). Family enhancement of cognitive style in anxious and aggressive children. J Abnorm Child Psychol, 24(2), 187–203. - PubMed
    1. Berry RR, & Lai B (2014). The emerging role of technology in cognitive–behavioral therapy for anxious youth: A review. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 32(1), 57–66. doi:10.1007/s10942-014-0184-5 - DOI
    1. Birmaher B, Khetarpal S, Brent D, Cully M, Balach L, Kaufman J, & Neer SM (1997). The Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED): Scale Construction and Psychometric Characteristics. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 36(4), 545–553. - PubMed
    1. Brooke J (1995). SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale. In Jordan PW, Thomas B, McClelland IL, & Weerdmeester B (Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189–194). London, UK: Taylor & Francis.

Publication types