Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Feb:137:103078.
doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2019.103078. Epub 2019 Dec 31.

Intrauterine infusion of autologous platelet-rich plasma in women undergoing assisted reproduction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Intrauterine infusion of autologous platelet-rich plasma in women undergoing assisted reproduction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Arezoo Maleki-Hajiagha et al. J Reprod Immunol. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Prior studies have provided conflicting results regarding the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in women undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic injection (ICSI). The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of the intrauterine infusion of PRP on the outcome of embryo transfer (ET) in women undergoing IVF/ICSI. We searched databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database of Clinical Trials (CENTRAL). Meta-analysis using a random-effects model was performed to calculate the pooled estimates. Seven studies involving 625 patients (311 cases and 314 controls) were included. The probability of chemical pregnancy (n = 3, risk ratio (RR): 1.79, 95 % confidence intervals (CI): 1.29, 2.50; P < 0.001, I2 = 0 %), clinical pregnancy (n = 7, RR: 1.79, 95 % CI: 1.37, 2.32; P < 0.001, I2 = 16 %), and implantation rate (n = 3, RR: 1.97, 95 % CI: 1.40, 2.79; P < 0.001, I2 = 0 %) was significantly higher in women who received PRP compared with control. There was no difference between women who received PRP compared with control group regarding miscarriage (RR: 0.72, 95 % CI: 0.27, 1.93; P = 0.51, I2 = 0 %). Following the intervention, endometrial thickness increased in women who received PRP compared to control group (SMD: 1.79, 95 % CI: 1.13, 2.44; P < 0.001, I2 = 64 %). The findings of this systematic review suggest that PRP is an alternative treatment strategy in patients with thin endometrium and recurrent implantation failure (RIF). Further prospective, large, and high quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed to identify the subpopulation that would most benefit from PRP.

Keywords: Assisted; Autologous platelet-rich plasma; Fertilization in vitro; Intracytoplasmic; PRP; Reproductive techniques; Sperm injections.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest None declared.