Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Practice Guideline
. 2020 Feb;42(2):204-217.e2.
doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2019.06.015.

Guideline No. 395-Female Genital Cutting

Affiliations
Practice Guideline

Guideline No. 395-Female Genital Cutting

Liette Perron et al. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: To decrease the likelihood that the practice of female genital cutting (FGC) be continued in the future and to improve the care of girls and women who have been subjected to FGC or who are at risk by providing (1) information intended to strengthen knowledge and understanding of the practice, (2) information regarding the legal issues related to the practice, (3) guidance for the management of its obstetrical and gynaecological complications, and (4) guidance on the provision of culturally competent care to girls and women affected by FGC.

Options: Strategies for the primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention of FGC and its complications.

Outcomes: The short- and long-term consequences of FGC.

Intended users: Health care providers delivering obstetrical and gynaecological care.

Target population: Women from countries where FGC is commonly practised and Canadian girls and women from groups who may practise FGC for cultural or religious reasons.

Evidence: Published literature was retrieved through searches of PubMed, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library in September 2010 using appropriate controlled vocabulary (e.g., Circumcision, Female) and key words (e.g., female genital mutilation, clitoridectomy, infibulation). Searches were updated and incorporated in the guideline revision December 2018.

Validation methods: The quality of evidence in this document was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.

Benefits, harms, and costs: There are no anticipated harms or costs to health care facilities with implementation of this guideline. Benefits may include a greater willingness of women living with FGC to seek timely care.

Summary statements: RECOMMENDATIONS.

Keywords: adolescent; circumcision, female; gynaecologic care; pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources