Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb;26(1):295-303.
doi: 10.1007/s40519-020-00854-2. Epub 2020 Feb 1.

Eating self-efficacy: validation of a new brief scale

Affiliations

Eating self-efficacy: validation of a new brief scale

Caterina Lombardo et al. Eat Weight Disord. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: Eating self-efficacy (ESE) is the belief in one's ability to self-regulate eating. Social and emotional situations may be differently challenging depending on the individual eating habits, body mass index and affects. Several ESE scales have been developed but most of them focus on weight management, dieting or healthy eating. The aim of the study was to validate a new brief scale assessing ESE in situations in which people face social or emotional pressures for excessive food intake.

Methods: Study 1: A sample of 412 volunteer females (age M = 25.44 ± 5.03) completed a first 25-item version of the scale. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted for selecting a subgroup of items composing the ESE brief scale (ESEBS). Study 2 assessed its psychometric properties through a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), analyzing the responses of 410 volunteer adults (273 females, 137 males).

Results: EFA of Study 1 evidenced a bifactorial structure. Four items for each factor were selected, explaining 63% of the variance. Study 2 confirmed the good fit of the bifactorial model (CFI = 0.9589; χ2 (19) = 62.852, p < 0.001; RMSEA = 0.075; SRMR = 0.040) and provided support for the measurement invariance of the scale across gender. The internal consistency was as follows: Social (α = 0.786), Emotional (α = 0.820). The concurrent validity of the subscales was demonstrated by significant latent negative correlations with measures of eating disorders and emotional eating.

Conclusions: The 8-items ESEBS appears as a valid and reliable instrument to assess eating self-efficacy related to social and emotional situations. Future studies should evaluate its potential use in non-clinical and clinical research and interventions.

Level of evidence: Level V, descriptive cross-sectional study.

Keywords: Eating behaviour; Eating self-efficacy; Factorial analysis; Scale; Validation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bandura A (1997) The exercise of control. WH Freeman, New York
    1. Clark MM, Abrams DB, Niaura RS et al (1991) Self-efficacy in weight management. J Consult Clin Psychol 59:739–744. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.59.5.739 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Glynn SM, Ruderman AJ (1986) The development and validation of an Eating Self-Efficacy Scale. Cognit Ther Res 10:403–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01173294 - DOI
    1. Leehr EJ, Krohmer K, Schag K et al (2015) Emotion regulation model in binge eating disorder and obesity—a systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 49:125–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.12.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Evers C, Marijn Stok F, de Ridder DTD (2010) Feeding your feelings: emotion regulation strategies and emotional eating. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 36:792–804. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210371383 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources