Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan;54(1):55-68.
doi: 10.1007/s43441-019-00029-x. Epub 2020 Jan 6.

A Proposed Framework for a Globally Applicable Pragmatic Approach to Using Facilitated Regulatory Pathways

Affiliations

A Proposed Framework for a Globally Applicable Pragmatic Approach to Using Facilitated Regulatory Pathways

Lawrence Liberti et al. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 Jan.

Abstract

Background: As regulatory agencies come under increased pressure to review medicines of critical importance through efficient regulatory systems to provide equitable access, the benefits of using expedited review pathways are being explored. These facilitated regulatory pathways (FRPs) provide a variety of review strategies that can also expedite assessments. Stringent regulatory authorities (SRAs) use primary FRPs to accelerate development or to shorten review time. Some emerging national regulatory authorities can implement primary FRPs but are more likely to use secondary FRPs that rely on or recognize an SRA or reference agency decision, the World Health Organization Collaborative Prequalification of Medicines Programme, "altruistic" reviews, or collaborative work sharing. Despite their availability, there are no formal guidelines or consensus for the definition, basic elements, or best practices for FRPs.

Methods: Herein, we present a 4-step pragmatic approach to a framework designed to help agencies determine how best to use FRPs. Each step is based on characteristics identified through research, surveys, literature assessments, regulatory capacity categorization analyses, and practical experience.

Results: Step 1 assesses 4 domains of the environment preparedness, step 2 offers process criteria that should be in place to effectively use an FRP, step 3 tiers agencies through a self-assessment of readiness and capacity, and step 4 provides a pathway for agencies to determine the most relevant FRP for their use. Target timelines are proposed for FRPs.

Conclusions: This framework represents the first endeavor to holistically address the multifaceted aspects that should be considered for the effective use of an FRP.

Keywords: FRPs; emerging regulatory authorities; facilitated regulatory pathway framework; facilitated regulatory pathways; primary facilitated regulatory pathways; secondary facilitated regulatory pathways.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources