Interpretation of Population Health Metrics: Environmental Lead Exposure as Exemplary Case
- PMID: 32008462
- PMCID: PMC8032208
- DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.14217
Interpretation of Population Health Metrics: Environmental Lead Exposure as Exemplary Case
Abstract
Our objective was to gain insight in the calculation and interpretation of population health metrics that inform disease prevention. Using as model environmental exposure to lead (ELE), a global pollutant, we assessed population health metrics derived from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1988 to 1994), the GBD (Global Burden of Disease Study 2010), and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. In the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, the hazard ratio relating mortality over 19.3 years of follow-up to a blood lead increase at baseline from 1.0 to 6.7 µg/dL (10th-90th percentile interval) was 1.37 (95% CI, 1.17-1.60). The population-attributable fraction of blood lead was 18.0% (10.9%-26.1%). The number of preventable ELE-related deaths in the United States would be 412 000 per year (250 000-598 000). In GBD 2010, deaths and disability-adjusted life-years globally lost due to ELE were 0.67 million (0.58-0.78 million) and 0.56% (0.47%-0.66%), respectively. According to the 2017 Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development statistics, ELE-related welfare costs were $1 676 224 million worldwide. Extrapolations from the foregoing metrics assumed causality and reversibility of the association between mortality and blood lead, which at present-day ELE levels in developed nations is not established. Other issues limiting the interpretation of ELE-related population health metrics are the inflation of relative risk based on outdated blood lead levels, not differentiating relative from absolute risk, clustering of risk factors and exposures within individuals, residual confounding, and disregarding noncardiovascular disease and immigration in national ELE-associated welfare estimates. In conclusion, this review highlights the importance of critical thinking in translating population health metrics into cost-effective preventive strategies.
Keywords: environmental exposure; lead; mortality; risk factors; welfare costs.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Low-level lead exposure and mortality in US adults: a population-based cohort study.Lancet Public Health. 2018 Apr;3(4):e177-e184. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30025-2. Epub 2018 Mar 12. Lancet Public Health. 2018. PMID: 29544878
-
Effects of short-term exposure to air pollution on hospital admissions of young children for acute lower respiratory infections in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2012 Jun;(169):5-72; discussion 73-83. Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2012. PMID: 22849236
-
Environmental and individual exposure and the risk of congenital anomalies: a review of recent epidemiological evidence.Epidemiol Prev. 2018 May-Aug;42(3-4 Suppl 1):1-34. doi: 10.19191/EP18.3-4.S1.P001.057. Epidemiol Prev. 2018. PMID: 30066535 Review. English.
-
CDC National Health Report: leading causes of morbidity and mortality and associated behavioral risk and protective factors--United States, 2005-2013.MMWR Suppl. 2014 Oct 31;63(4):3-27. MMWR Suppl. 2014. PMID: 25356673
-
Calculation of the disease burden associated with environmental chemical exposures: application of toxicological information in health economic estimation.Environ Health. 2017 Dec 5;16(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12940-017-0340-3. Environ Health. 2017. PMID: 29202828 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Two-Year Responses of Office and Ambulatory Blood Pressure to First Occupational Lead Exposure.Hypertension. 2020 Oct;76(4):1299-1307. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15590. Epub 2020 Sep 9. Hypertension. 2020. PMID: 32903104 Free PMC article.
-
Public and occupational health risks related to lead exposure updated according to present-day blood lead levels.Hypertens Res. 2023 Feb;46(2):395-407. doi: 10.1038/s41440-022-01069-x. Epub 2022 Oct 18. Hypertens Res. 2023. PMID: 36257978 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Lead-associated mortality in the US 1999-2020: a time-stratified analysis of a national cohort.J Hypertens. 2024 Aug 1;42(8):1322-1330. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003713. Epub 2024 Mar 14. J Hypertens. 2024. PMID: 38511337 Free PMC article.
-
Global burden and influencing factors of chronic kidney disease due to type 2 diabetes in adults aged 20-59 years, 1990-2019.Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 19;13(1):20234. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47091-y. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37981642 Free PMC article.
-
Relative and Absolute Risk to Guide the Management of Pulse Pressure, an Age-Related Cardiovascular Risk Factor.Am J Hypertens. 2021 Sep 22;34(9):929-938. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpab048. Am J Hypertens. 2021. PMID: 33687055 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Staessen JA, Roels H, Fagard R for the PheeCad Investigators. Lead exposure and conventional and ambulatory blood pressure. A prospective population study. J Am Med Ass. 1996;275:1563–1570. - PubMed
-
- Yang WY, Efremov L, Mujaj B, Zhang ZY, Wei FF, Huang QF, Thijs L, Vanassche T, Nawrot TS, Staessen JA. Association of office and ambulatory blood pressure with blood lead in workers before occupational exposure. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2018;12:14–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2017.10.010. - PubMed
-
- Staessen JA, Lauwerys RR, Buchet JP, Bulpitt CJ, Rondia D, Vanrenterghem Y, Amery A. Impairment of renal function with increasing blood lead concentrations in the general population. The Cadmibel Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:151–156. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199207163270303. - PubMed
-
- Staessen JA, Nawrot T, Hond ED, Thijs L, Fagard R, Hoppenbrouwers K, Koppen G, Nelen V, Schoeters G, Vanderschueren D, et al. Renal function, cytogenetic measurements, and sexual development in adolescents in relation to environmental pollutants: a feasibility study of biomarkers. Lancet. 2001;357:1660–1669. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04822-4. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources