Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jun;22(6):904-915.
doi: 10.1111/dom.13984. Epub 2020 Feb 18.

Metformin and cardiorenal outcomes in diabetes: A reappraisal

Affiliations
Review

Metformin and cardiorenal outcomes in diabetes: A reappraisal

John R Petrie et al. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

The guidance issued to the pharmaceutical industry by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2008 has led to the publication of a series of randomized, controlled cardiovascular outcomes trials with newer therapeutic classes of glucose-lowering medications. Several of these trials, which evaluated the newer therapeutic classes of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, have reported a reduced incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and/or renal outcomes, usually relative to placebo and standard of care. Metformin was the first glucose-lowering agent reported to improve cardiovascular outcomes in the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) and thus became the foundation of standard care. However, as this clinical trial reported more than 20 years ago, differences from current standards of trial design and evaluation complicate comparison of the cardiovascular profiles of older and newer agents. Our article revisits the evidence for cardiovascular protection with metformin and reviews its effects on the kidney.

Keywords: atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; cardiovascular outcomes; chronic kidney disease; glucose-lowering therapy; metformin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

I.W.C. has received honoraria for work on advisory boards and lecturing from Johnson & Johnson, Lilly, Merck, MSD, Sanofi and Takeda. J.R.P. has received payment via the University of Glasgow for advisory and consultancy work on behalf of Novo Nordisk, Sanofi‐Aventis and for work on clinical trials committees on behalf of ACI Clinical (Boehringer), Janssen, Novo Nordisk, Quintiles (Genentech, Roche), and Sanofi‐Aventis, and has received travel and accommodation support from Novo Nordisk and Merck KGaA. J.R.P. has also received donation of services to support investigator‐led research from Merck KGaA, Itamar Medical (Israel) and DEXCOM, and investigator‐led research funding from Janssen (RISC study). J.R.P. holds no stock in any pharmaceutical or technology company. P.R.R. has received consultancy and/or speaking fees (to his institution) from AbbVie, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Gilead, Eli Lilly, MSD, Merck, Mundi, Novo Nordisk and Sanofi Aventis, and has received research grants from AstraZeneca and Novo Nordisk.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Summary of randomized allocation of patients to treatment in the UK Prospective diabetes study. SU, sulphonylurea; T2D, type 2 diabetes. aConventional treatment policy in the UKPDS. bThese patients were included in the main trial analysis (UKPDS 33). cUKPDS 34. dDefined as fasting plasma glucose 6.1–15 mmol/L (110–270 mg/dL) without symptoms of hyperglycaemia. Adapted from references7, 8 with permission from Elsevier
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relative risks of principal clinical outcomes from patients randomized to intensive glycaemic management with metformin or to conventional management policy in the UKPDS, and from patients previously in these randomized groups after 10 years of post‐trial follow‐up. aComposite of sudden death, death from hyperglycaemia or hypoglycaemia, fatal or non‐fatal myocardial infarction, angina, heart failure, stroke, renal failure, amputation (≥1 digit), vitreous haemorrhage, retinopathy requiring photocoagulation, blindness in one eye, or cataract extraction. bDeath from myocardial infarction, stroke, peripheral vascular disease, renal disease, hypoglycaemia or hyperglycaemia, and sudden death. Drawn from data presented in references7, 10
Figure 3
Figure 3
Serum concentrations of metformin and lactate above and below 2.5 mg/L during 4 months of administration of metformin to people with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Total daily metformin dosages differed between patients with CKD 3A (1500 mg), CKD 3B (1000 mg) and CKD 4 (500 mg); see text. Drawn from data presented in reference34
Figure 4
Figure 4
Proposed antiatherothrombotic mechanisms of metformin. Effects observed in humans are shown in black rectangles, while effects shown in experimental studies are shown in shaded rectangles. Adapted from reference65 with permission from Elsevier; see also references in this review

References

    1. Nagahisa T, Saisho Y. Cardiorenal protection: potential of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP‐1 receptor agonists in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Ther. 2019;10:1733‐1752. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buse JB, Wexler DJ, Tsapas A, et al. 2019 Update to: Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2018. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2020;43:487‐493. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pratley RE, Handelsman Y. Should metformin be the first‐line therapy choice in type 2 diabetes treatment? Endocrine Today. https://www.healio.com/endocrinology/diabetes/news/print/endocrine-today.... Accessed October, 2019.
    1. Bailey CJ, Campbell IW, JCN C, Davidson JA, HCS H, Ritz P, eds. Metformin: The Gold Standard. A Scientific Handbook. Chichester, UK: Wiley; 2007.
    1. Campbell IW, HCS H, Holman RR, Bailey CJ, eds. Metformin: 60 years of Clinical Experience. Addendum to the Scientific Handbook. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley; 2016.

Publication types

MeSH terms