Safety and Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine versus Propofol Infusion as an Adjunct to Transtracheal Block in Ensuring Patient Immobility During General Anesthesia without the Use of Muscle Relaxants
- PMID: 32009715
- PMCID: PMC6937896
- DOI: 10.4103/aer.AER_134_19
Safety and Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine versus Propofol Infusion as an Adjunct to Transtracheal Block in Ensuring Patient Immobility During General Anesthesia without the Use of Muscle Relaxants
Abstract
Background: In surgeries where nerve stimulation study is required intraoperatively, the use of long-acting muscle relaxants should be avoided.
Aim of study: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus propofol infusion as an adjunct to transtracheal block to ensure patient immobility during general anesthesia without the use of muscle relaxants and to compare hemodynamics in both the groups.
Settings and design: It was a prospective randomized controlled trial done at a tertiary care center.
Subjects and methods: Forty adult patients undergoing brachial plexus surgeries were included in the study and all patients received a transtracheal block just before the induction. After standardized induction and intubation, Group D received intravenous (i.v.) bolus of dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg.kg-1 body weight followed by infusion at 0.5 μg/kg/h intraoperatively. In Group B, the infusion of propofol was started at 1 mg/kg/h after induction. In both the groups, if the patient moved, bucked on endotracheal tube, or if there were signs of inadequate depth of anesthesia, bolus of propofol 0.5 mg.kg-1 i.v. was given and repeated as required.
Statistical tests used: Mann-Whitney U-test and Fisher's exact test were used for the statistical analysis.
Results: Number of times propofol bolus was required intraoperatively and hemodynamic parameters were comparable in both the groups at all-time points. Time to extubate was significantly higher in Group P compared to Group D (16.06 ± 5.78 vs. 9.61 ± 11.53 min).
Conclusion: The use of dexmedetomidine infusion as an adjunct to transtracheal block is superior to propofol infusion in view of significantly shorter extubation time though both the agents provided comparable intraoperative hemodynamics and patient immobility.
Keywords: Dexmedetomidine; general anesthesia; propofol; relaxants; transtracheal.
Copyright: © 2019 Anesthesia: Essays and Researches.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Effectiveness of transtracheal lidocaine as an adjunct to general anesthesia in providing patient immobility during total parotidectomy: A comparison with dexmedetomidine infusion.J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Apr-Jun;33(2):193-196. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.209752. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2017. PMID: 28781444 Free PMC article.
-
Transtracheal lidocaine: An alternative to intraoperative propofol infusion when muscle relaxants are not used.J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Apr;30(2):199-202. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.130016. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2014. PMID: 24803757 Free PMC article.
-
Transtracheal lidocaine injection reduces the anesthetic requirements in brachial plexus surgeries.Anesth Essays Res. 2013 Jan-Apr;7(1):110-5. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.114015. Anesth Essays Res. 2013. PMID: 25885731 Free PMC article.
-
Propofol/dexmedetomidine and propofol/ketamine combinations for anesthesia in pediatric patients undergoing transcatheter atrial septal defect closure: a prospective randomized study.Clin Ther. 2010 Apr;32(4):701-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.04.010. Clin Ther. 2010. PMID: 20435239 Clinical Trial.
-
Effectiveness of dexmedetomidine versus propofol on extubation times, length of stay and mortality rates in adult cardiac surgery patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2018 May;16(5):1220-1239. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003488. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2018. PMID: 29762314
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials