Cognitive Fitness Framework: Towards Assessing, Training and Augmenting Individual-Difference Factors Underpinning High-Performance Cognition
- PMID: 32009919
- PMCID: PMC6971199
- DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00466
Cognitive Fitness Framework: Towards Assessing, Training and Augmenting Individual-Difference Factors Underpinning High-Performance Cognition
Erratum in
-
Erratum: Cognitive Fitness Framework: Towards Assessing, Training and Augmenting Individual-Difference Factors Underpinning High-Performance Cognition.Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Sep 1;15:749619. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.749619. eCollection 2021. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 34539365 Free PMC article.
Abstract
The aim of this article is to introduce the concept of Cognitive Fitness (CF), identify its key ingredients underpinning both real-time task performance and career longevity in high-risk occupations, and to canvas a holistic framework for their assessment, training, and augmentation. CF as a capacity to deploy neurocognitive resources, knowledge and skills to meet the demands of operational task performance, is likely to be multi-faceted and differentially malleable. A taxonomy of CF constructs derived from Cognitive Readiness (CR) and Mental fitness (MF) literature maps into phases of operational cycle from foundational to advanced, mission-ready and recovery. Foundational cognitive attributes, such as attention, executive control and co-action, were hypothesized to be trainable at the initial Cognitive Gym phase. More advanced training targets at the CR phase included stress and arousal regulation, adaptability, teamwork, situation awareness (including detection, sense-making and prediction) and decision making (de-biasing and confidence calibration). The mission-ready training phase is focused on tolerances (to sleep loss, monotony, pain, frustration, uncertainty) and resistance (to distraction, deception or manipulation). Operational Augmentation phase relies on support tools such as decision aids and fatigue countermeasures, while the Recovery phase employs reflexive (e.g., mindfulness), and restorative practices (e.g., nutrition and sleep hygiene). The periodization of cognitive training in this cycle is hypothesized to optimize both real-time cognitive performance and the resilience that enables life-long thriving. One of the most promising avenues of validating this hypothesis is by developing an expert consensus on the key CF ingredients and their relative importance in high-performance settings.
Keywords: RDoC domains cognitive functioning; cognitive fitness; measurement; operational readiness cycle; task performance; trainability.
Copyright © 2020 Aidman.
References
-
- Ahn B., Cox M. F. (2016). Knowledge, skills and attributes of graduate student and postdoctoral mentors in undergraduate research settings. J. Eng. Educat. 105, 605–629. 10.1002/jee.20129 - DOI
-
- Aidman E. (2017). The cognitive fitness framework: a roadmap for systematic, evidence-based mental skills training and performance enhancement. J. Sci. Med. Sport 20, S50–S52. 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.09.159 - DOI
-
- Aidman E. (2005). “Measuring subjective components of fatigue: the role of effort perception,” in Promoting Health and Performance for Life: Proceedings of the ISSP 11th World Congress of Sport Psychology, eds Morris T., Terry P., Gordon S., Hanrahan S., Ievleva L., Kolt G., et al. (Sydney: International Society of Sport Psychology; ).
-
- Aidman E., Crampton J., Brown T., Bond J. (2016). “Mental skills training meets future neuro-technologies: enhancing cognitive performance through systematic intervention,” in Paper Presented at the 2016 APS Congress, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
