Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec 12:13:990.
doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2019.990. eCollection 2019.

Recruiting cancer survivors into research studies using online methods: a secondary analysis from an international cancer survivorship cohort study

Affiliations

Recruiting cancer survivors into research studies using online methods: a secondary analysis from an international cancer survivorship cohort study

Nicholas J Hulbert-Williams et al. Ecancermedicalscience. .

Abstract

Recruiting participants into cancer survivorship research remains a significant challenge. Few studies have tested and compared the relative use of non-clinical online recruitment methods, especially in samples of adult cancer survivors. This paper reports on the feasibility of recruiting a representative cohort of cancer survivors using online social media. Two hundred participants with cancer diagnosis within the past 12 months were recruited via social media (Facebook, Twitter and Reddit) into a longitudinal questionnaire study. Different methods of online recruitment proved to be more effective than others over time. Paid Facebook boosting, Reddit posts and Twitter advertisements placed by existing cancer charities proved most helpful in reaching our recruitment target (contributing 27%, 22% and 32%, respectively). Recruiting online achieved a more demographically and clinically representative sample for our study: our subject was younger, less heteronormative, including those with a range of clinical diagnoses, primary and recurrence illness, and patients who had both completed and were still receiving treatment. This was certainly not a quick method of sample recruitment but that could have been optimised by focussing only on the three most effective methods described earlier. While we found that online recruitment is significantly lower in cost than traditional recruitment methods, and can reduce some biases, there still remains the potential for some biases (e.g. excluding much older participants) and ethical/methodological issues (e.g. excluding those without access to Internet). We outline our recruitment strategy, retention rates and a cost breakdown in order to guide other researchers considering such methods for future research in cancer survivorship.

Keywords: methodology; online; psychosocial; recruitment; survivorship.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Cumulative recruitment and notable changes in recruitment strategy over time.

References

    1. Hulbert-Williams NJ, Beatty L, Dhillon H. Psychological support for patients with cancer: evidence review and suggestions for future research. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2018;12(3):276–292. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000360. - DOI - PubMed
    1. van Lankveld JJDM, Fleer J, Schroevers MJ, et al. Recruitment problems in psychosocial oncology research. Psycho-Oncology. 2018;27(9):2296–2298. doi: 10.1002/pon.4792. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ransom S, Azzarello LM, McMillan SC. Methodological issues in the recruitment of cancer pain patients and their caregivers. Res Nurs Health. 2016;29(3):190–198. doi: 10.1002/nur.20129. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Howell DC. Fundamental Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Wadsworth: Nelson Education; 2013. p. 8.
    1. McMillan SC, Weitzner MA. Methodologic issues in collecting data from debilitated patients with cancer near the end of life. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2003;30(1):123–129. doi: 10.1188/03.ONF.123-129. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources