Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec 12:13:992.
doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2019.992. eCollection 2019.

Building a comprehensive cancer survivorship program

Tessa Flores  1 , Kathryn M Glaser  2 , Douglas McDaniel  2   3 , Denise Rokitka  3 , Katharine A Amato  4   5 , Mary E Reid  1
Affiliations

Building a comprehensive cancer survivorship program

Tessa Flores et al. Ecancermedicalscience. .

Abstract

There is a significant increase in the number of people surviving cancer as a result of improved detection and better treatments. In the United States (US) alone, these numbers are estimated to reach 20 million by 2026 [Miller et al (2016) CA Cancer J Clin 66(4) 271-289)]; [Bluethmann et al (2016) Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 25(7) 1029-1036]. Living through cancer treatment represents a life-changing event, often including residual and long-term emotional, physical, psychological and spiritual sequelae. Survivorship programming must encompass the clinical management of medical issues, local support services for patients and their caregivers, protocols for communicating with community primary care providers (PCPs) and education for all clinicians in the survivorship continuum on the issues impacting survivors. This article will discuss a range of issues that should be addressed when developing a comprehensive, multi-disciplinary cancer survivorship care.

Keywords: cancer continuum; cancer survivorship; integrative medicine; long-term survivors; quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest to declare for any of these authors relative to this work.

References

    1. Miller KD, Siegel RL, Lin CC, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(4):271–289. doi: 10.3322/caac.21349. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bluethmann SM, Mariotto AB, Rowland JH. Anticipating the ‘silver tsunami’: prevalence trajectories and comorbidity burden among older cancer survivors in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016;25(7):1029–1036. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0133. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alfano CM, Jefford M, Maher J, et al. Building personalized cancer follow-up care pathways in the United States: lessons learned from implementation in England, Northern Ireland, and Australia. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2019;39:625–639. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_238267. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alfano CM, Mayer DK, Bhatia S, et al. Implementing personalized pathways for cancer follow-up care in the United States:Pproceedings from an American Cancer Society-American Society of Clinical Oncology summit. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(3):234–247. doi: 10.3322/caac.21558. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gage EA, Pailler M, Zevon MA, et al. Structuring survivorship care: discipline-specific clinician perspectives. J Cancer Surviv. 2011;5(3):217–225. doi: 10.1007/s11764-011-0174-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources