Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr;29(4):775-780.
doi: 10.1002/pon.5347. Epub 2020 Mar 2.

Clinical assessment of emotions in patients with cancer: Diagnostic accuracy compared with two reference standards

Myra E van Linde  1 , Annemarie M J Braamse  2 , Emma H Collette  2 , Adriaan W Hoogendoorn  3 , Frank J Snoek  2 , Henk M W Verheul  4 , Joost Dekker  3
Affiliations

Clinical assessment of emotions in patients with cancer: Diagnostic accuracy compared with two reference standards

Myra E van Linde et al. Psychooncology. 2020 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Previous research has suggested that clinical assessment of emotions in patients with cancer is suboptimal. However, it is a possibility that well-trained and experienced doctors and nurses do recognize emotions but that they do not evaluate all emotions as necessitating professional mental health care. This implies that the sensitivity of clinical assessment should be tested against the need for professional mental health care as reference standard, instead of emotional distress. We hypothesized that the observed sensitivity of clinical assessment of emotions would be higher when tested against need for professional mental health care as reference standard, compared with emotional distress as reference standard.

Patients and methods: A consecutive series of patients starting with chemotherapy were recruited during their routine clinical care, at a department of medical oncology. Clinical assessment of emotions by medical oncologists and nurses was derived from the patient file. Emotional distress and need for professional mental health care were assessed using the Distress Thermometer and Problem List.

Results: Clinical assessment resulted in notes on emotions in 42.2% of the patient files with 36.2% of patients experiencing emotional distress and 10.8% expressing a need for professional mental health care (N = 185). As expected, the sensitivity of clinical assessment of emotions was higher with the reference standard "need for professional mental health care" compared with "emotional distress" (P < .001). For specificity, equivalent results were obtained with the two reference standards (P = .63).

Conclusions: Clinical assessment of emotions in patients with cancer may be more accurate than previously concluded.

Keywords: assessment; cancer; distress; emotion; mental health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Gouveia L, Lelorain S, Bredart A, et al. Oncologists’ perception of depressive symptoms in patients with advanced cancer: accuracy and relational correlates. BMC Psychol. 2015;3(1):6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bauwens S, Baillon C, Distelmans W, Theuns P. Systematic screening for distress in oncology practice using the distress barometer: the impact on referrals to psychosocial care. Psychooncology. 2014;23(7):804‐811. - PubMed
    1. Werner A, Stenner C, Schuz J. Patient versus clinician symptom reporting: how accurate is the detection of distress in the oncologic after‐care? Psychooncology. 2012;21(8):818‐826. - PubMed
    1. Frijda NH. The Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1986.
    1. Lewis M, Haviland‐Jones JM, Feldman BL. Handbook of Emotions. New York: The Guilford Press; 2010.

Publication types