Engagement and Participant Experiences With Consumer Smartwatches for Health Research: Longitudinal, Observational Feasibility Study
- PMID: 32012078
- PMCID: PMC7016619
- DOI: 10.2196/14368
Engagement and Participant Experiences With Consumer Smartwatches for Health Research: Longitudinal, Observational Feasibility Study
Abstract
Background: Wearables provide opportunities for frequent health data collection and symptom monitoring. The feasibility of using consumer cellular smartwatches to provide information both on symptoms and contemporary sensor data has not yet been investigated.
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of using cellular smartwatches to capture multiple patient-reported outcomes per day alongside continuous physical activity data over a 3-month period in people living with knee osteoarthritis (OA).
Methods: For the KOALAP (Knee OsteoArthritis: Linking Activity and Pain) study, a novel cellular smartwatch app for health data collection was developed. Participants (age ≥50 years; self-diagnosed knee OA) received a smartwatch (Huawei Watch 2) with the KOALAP app. When worn, the watch collected sensor data and prompted participants to self-report outcomes multiple times per day. Participants were invited for a baseline and follow-up interview to discuss their motivations and experiences. Engagement with the watch was measured using daily watch wear time and the percentage completion of watch questions. Interview transcripts were analyzed using grounded thematic analysis.
Results: A total of 26 people participated in the study. Good use and engagement were observed over 3 months: most participants wore the watch on 75% (68/90) of days or more, for a median of 11 hours. The number of active participants declined over the study duration, especially in the final week. Among participants who remained active, neither watch time nor question completion percentage declined over time. Participants were mainly motivated to learn about their symptoms and enjoyed the self-tracking aspects of the watch. Barriers to full engagement were battery life limitations, technical problems, and unfulfilled expectations of the watch. Participants reported that they would have liked to report symptoms more than 4 or 5 times per day.
Conclusions: This study shows that capture of patient-reported outcomes multiple times per day with linked sensor data from a smartwatch is feasible over at least a 3-month period.
International registered report identifier (irrid): RR2-10.2196/10238.
Keywords: mHealth; medical informatics computing; mobile phone; musculoskeletal diseases; patient-reported outcomes; self-tracking; smartwatch/wearable.
©Anna L L Beukenhorst, Kelly Howells, Louise Cook, John McBeth, Terence W O'Neill, Matthew J Parkes, Caroline Sanders, Jamie C Sergeant, Katy S Weihrich, William G Dixon. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 29.01.2020.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: WGD has provided consultancy for Google and Bayer Pharmaceuticals.
Figures







Similar articles
-
Engagement with consumer smartwatches for tracking symptoms of individuals living with multiple long-term conditions (multimorbidity): A longitudinal observational study.J Multimorb Comorb. 2021 Nov 30;11:26335565211062791. doi: 10.1177/26335565211062791. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec. J Multimorb Comorb. 2021. PMID: 34869047 Free PMC article.
-
Collecting Symptoms and Sensor Data With Consumer Smartwatches (the Knee OsteoArthritis, Linking Activity and Pain Study): Protocol for a Longitudinal, Observational Feasibility Study.JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Jan 23;8(1):e10238. doi: 10.2196/10238. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019. PMID: 30672745 Free PMC article.
-
Consumer Smartwatches for Collecting Self-Report and Sensor Data: App Design and Engagement.Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018;247:291-295. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018. PMID: 29677969
-
Participant Engagement and Adherence to Providing Smartwatch and Patient-Reported Outcome Data: Digital Tracking of Rheumatoid Arthritis Longitudinally (DIGITAL) Real-World Study.JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Nov 7;10:e44034. doi: 10.2196/44034. JMIR Hum Factors. 2023. PMID: 37934559 Free PMC article.
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Applications of Wearable Technology in a Real-Life Setting in People with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Scoping Review.J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 30;10(23):5645. doi: 10.3390/jcm10235645. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 34884347 Free PMC article.
-
Engagement with consumer smartwatches for tracking symptoms of individuals living with multiple long-term conditions (multimorbidity): A longitudinal observational study.J Multimorb Comorb. 2021 Nov 30;11:26335565211062791. doi: 10.1177/26335565211062791. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec. J Multimorb Comorb. 2021. PMID: 34869047 Free PMC article.
-
Self-Management of Subclinical Common Mental Health Disorders (Anxiety, Depression and Sleep Disorders) Using Wearable Devices.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 1;20(3):2636. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032636. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36768002 Free PMC article.
-
Exploiting real-world data to monitor physical activity in patients with osteoarthritis: the opportunity of digital epidemiology.Heliyon. 2022 Feb 22;8(2):e08991. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08991. eCollection 2022 Feb. Heliyon. 2022. PMID: 35252602 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Engagement and attrition with eHealth tools for remote monitoring in chronic arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.RMD Open. 2022 Oct;8(2):e002625. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002625. RMD Open. 2022. PMID: 36302561 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Papi E, Murtagh GM, McGregor AH. Wearable technologies in osteoarthritis: a qualitative study of clinicians' preferences. BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 25;6(1):e009544. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009544. http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=26810998 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Espay AJ, Bonato P, Nahab FB, Maetzler W, Dean JM, Klucken J, Eskofier BM, Merola A, Horak F, Lang AE, Reilmann R, Giuffrida J, Nieuwboer A, Horne M, Little MA, Litvan I, Simuni T, Dorsey ER, Burack MA, Kubota K, Kamondi A, Godinho C, Daneault J, Mitsi G, Krinke L, Hausdorff JM, Bloem BR, Papapetropoulos S, Movement Disorders Society Task Force on Technology Technology in Parkinson's disease: challenges and opportunities. Mov Disord. 2016 Sep;31(9):1272–82. doi: 10.1002/mds.26642. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/27125836 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Piwek L, Ellis DA, Andrews S, Joinson A. The rise of consumer health wearables: promises and barriers. PLoS Med. 2016 Feb;13(2):e1001953. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001953. http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001953 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Dobkin BH, Dorsch A. The promise of mHealth: daily activity monitoring and outcome assessments by wearable sensors. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25(9):788–98. doi: 10.1177/1545968311425908. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/21989632 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Liu S. Statista. 2019. Mar 13, [2019-12-02]. Number of Internet of Things (Iot) Connections Worldwide from 2016 to 2021, by Access Technology (in Millions). https://www.statista.com/statistics/774002/worldwide-connected-devices-b...
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous