Mobile Health Projects in a High-Complexity Reference Hospital: Case Study
- PMID: 32012092
- PMCID: PMC7055769
- DOI: 10.2196/16247
Mobile Health Projects in a High-Complexity Reference Hospital: Case Study
Abstract
Background: The widespread adoption of mobile and wearable devices and apps makes it essential to assess their possible impact on the management of health and diseases. Health care providers (HCPs) find themselves faced with a new situation in their setting with the proliferation of mobile health (mHealth) intervention tests. Few studies have addressed the development of mHealth and the methodologies to manage these apps in a tertiary hospital.
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the mHealth projects implemented in the Hospital Clínic of Barcelona to increase awareness of the context in which they are used and to develop policies for the development of good practice in mHealth innovation.
Methods: A prospective, descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in a highly specialized university hospital with 850 beds for adults and a reference population of 520,000 inhabitants. A specific questionnaire was developed based on the Mobile Health 5 Dimensions European (MOHE 5D-EU) theoretical model to find mHealth projects. Apps, telemedicine, and wearable devices were included in the systematic search. For that purpose, a vertical (top-down) email-based snowball process was conducted. Data were collected from February to December 2018 by conducting personal interviews with HCPs using a structured questionnaire.
Results: During the study period, 45 interviews were conducted; 35 mHealth initiatives were found, with 25 targeted to patients and 10 to health professionals. Most mHealth initiatives (34/35, 97%) were related to the software field (apps and telemedicine initiatives), and one was related to wearable devices. Among the projects, 68% (24/35) were classified as medical devices or developments at the edge (developments susceptible to limitations depending on the intended use). In relation to data protection, 27 initiatives managing personal data (27/35, 77%) considered data protection legislation. Only 9% (3/35) of the initiatives had foreseen the use of interconnectivity standards. Most of the initiatives were funded by grants (14/35, 40%), sponsorships (5/35, 14%), or the hospital itself (5/35, 14%). In terms of clinical management, most projects were developed in the field of research, followed by professional tools, clinical information, and therapeutic education. Only 6 projects were involved with health care; all were led by either the industry or small and medium enterprises.
Conclusions: This study helped create the design of a map of the mHealth projects conducted in our hospital that showed the stages of development of the different ongoing projects. This will allow monitoring of mHealth projects and construction of tools to reinforce areas with detected deficiencies. Our theoretical approach using a modified MOHE 5D-EU model was found to be useful for analyzing the characteristics of mHealth projects.
Keywords: mobile health; observational study.
©Inmaculada Grau-Corral, Margarida Jansà, Pau Gascon, Raimundo Lozano-Rubí, Percy Efrain Pantoja, Daria Roca, Valentín Aragunde Miguens, Diego Hidalgo-Mazzei, Joan Escarrabill. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 31.01.2020.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Patients and Stakeholders' Perspectives Regarding the Privacy, Security, and Confidentiality of Data Collected via Mobile Health Apps in Saudi Arabia: Protocol for a Mixed Method Study.JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 May 22;13:e54933. doi: 10.2196/54933. JMIR Res Protoc. 2024. PMID: 38776540 Free PMC article.
-
A patient as a self-manager of their personal data on health and disease with new technology--challenges for nursing education.Nurse Educ Today. 2015 Dec;35(12):e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.08.017. Epub 2015 Aug 28. Nurse Educ Today. 2015. PMID: 26427668
-
Comparison of Mobile Health Technology Use for Self-Tracking Between Older Adults and the General Adult Population in Canada: Cross-Sectional Survey.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Nov 27;8(11):e24718. doi: 10.2196/24718. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020. PMID: 33104517 Free PMC article.
-
Standards for Mobile Health-Related Apps: Systematic Review and Development of a Guide.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Mar 3;8(3):e13057. doi: 10.2196/13057. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020. PMID: 32130169 Free PMC article.
-
Mobile Medical Apps and mHealth Devices: A Framework to Build Medical Apps and mHealth Devices in an Ethical Manner to Promote Safer Use - A Literature Review.Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;235:363-367. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017. PMID: 28423815 Review.
References
-
- GSMA Intelligence GSMA Intelligence. 2017. [2019-05-27]. Number of Unique Mobile Subscribers Worldwide Hits Five Billion https://www.gsmaintelligence.com/research/2017/06/number-of-unique-mobil...
-
- GSMA. 2019. [2019-05-30]. The Mobile Economy 2019 https://www.gsma.com/r/mobileeconomy/
-
- Clement J. Statista. New York, NY 10004 United States: Statista; 2019. [2019-07-17]. Number of Apps Available in Leading App Stores as of 3rd Quarter 2019 https://www.statista.com/statistics/276623/number-of-apps-available-in-l...
-
- Pohl M. research2guidance. 2018. [2019-09-12]. 325,000 Mobile Health Apps Available in 2017 - Android Now the Leading mHealth Platform Internet https://research2guidance.com/325000-mobile-health-apps-available-in-2017/
-
- Spok: The Leader in Clinical Communication Solutions. Springfield, Virginia: Spok; 2018. [2018-06-04]. Mobility in Healthcare Survey https://www.spok.com/resources/spok-skim-articles/mobility-strategies-su....
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical