Smartphone Cardiac Rehabilitation, Assisted Self-Management Versus Usual Care: Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Effects and Costs Among People With Coronary Heart Disease
- PMID: 32012103
- PMCID: PMC7011127
- DOI: 10.2196/15022
Smartphone Cardiac Rehabilitation, Assisted Self-Management Versus Usual Care: Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Effects and Costs Among People With Coronary Heart Disease
Abstract
Background: Alternative evidence-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) delivery models that overcome significant barriers to access and delivery are needed to address persistent low utilization. Models utilizing contemporary digital technologies could significantly improve reach and fidelity as complementary alternatives to traditional center-based programs.
Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the effects and costs of the innovative Smartphone Cardiac Rehabilitation, Assisted self-Management (SCRAM) intervention with usual care CR.
Methods: In this investigator-, assessor-, and statistician-blinded parallel 2-arm randomized controlled trial, 220 adults (18+ years) with coronary heart disease are being recruited from 3 hospitals in metropolitan and regional Victoria, Australia. Participants are randomized (1:1) to receive advice to engage with usual care CR or the SCRAM intervention. SCRAM is a 24-week dual-phase intervention that includes 12 weeks of real-time remote exercise supervision and coaching from exercise physiologists, which is followed by 12 weeks of data-driven nonreal-time remote coaching via telephone. Both intervention phases include evidence- and theory-based multifactorial behavior change support delivered via smartphone push notifications. Outcomes assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks include maximal aerobic exercise capacity (primary outcome at 24 weeks), modifiable cardiovascular risk factors, exercise adherence, secondary prevention self-management behaviors, health-related quality of life, and adverse events. Economic and process evaluations will determine cost-effectiveness and participant perceptions of the treatment arms, respectively.
Results: The trial was funded in November 2017 and received ethical approval in June 2018. Recruitment began in November 2018. As of September 2019, 54 participants have been randomized into the trial.
Conclusions: The innovative multiphase SCRAM intervention delivers real-time remote exercise supervision and evidence-based self-management behavioral support to participants, regardless of their geographic proximity to traditional center-based CR facilities. Our trial will provide unique and valuable information about effects of SCRAM on outcomes associated with cardiac and all-cause mortality, as well as acceptability and cost-effectiveness. These findings will be important to inform health care providers about the potential for innovative program delivery models, such as SCRAM, to be implemented at scale, as a complement to existing CR programs. The inclusion of a cohort comprising metropolitan-, regional-, and rural-dwelling participants will help to understand the role of this delivery model across health care contexts with diverse needs.
Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN): 12618001458224; anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=374508.
International registered report identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/15022.
Keywords: behavioral medicine; coronary artery disease; costs and cost analysis; exercise; health services accessibility; mHealth; myocardial ischemia; telemedicine; telerehabilitation.
©Jonathan Charles Rawstorn, Kylie Ball, Brian Oldenburg, Clara K Chow, Sarah A McNaughton, Karen Elaine Lamb, Lan Gao, Marj Moodie, John Amerena, Voltaire Nadurata, Christopher Neil, Stuart Cameron, Ralph Maddison. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 27.01.2020.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: The SCRAM platform and intervention content build on work initiated at the University of Auckland’s National Institute for Health Innovation. The software and intervention content were developed by Deakin University’s Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition—led by RM, JCR, and SC—in conjunction with cardiac rehabilitation specialists and exercise scientists. We declare no further financial or competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Economic evaluation protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial to compare Smartphone Cardiac Rehabilitation, Assisted self-Management (SCRAM) versus usual care cardiac rehabilitation among people with coronary heart disease.BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 26;10(8):e038178. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038178. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32847918 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating a Remotely Delivered Cardio-Oncology Rehabilitation Intervention for Patients With Breast Cancer (REMOTE-COR-B): Protocol for a Single-Arm Feasibility Trial.JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Apr 5;13:e53301. doi: 10.2196/53301. JMIR Res Protoc. 2024. PMID: 38578682 Free PMC article.
-
Text4Heart II - improving medication adherence in people with heart disease: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2018 Jan 25;19(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2468-z. Trials. 2018. PMID: 29370829 Free PMC article.
-
Implementation of Telerehabilitation Interventions for the Self-Management of Cardiovascular Disease: Systematic Review.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Nov 27;8(11):e17957. doi: 10.2196/17957. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020. PMID: 33245286 Free PMC article.
-
Hybrid cardiac rehabilitation - The state of the science and the way forward.Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2022 Jan-Feb;70:175-182. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2021.12.004. Epub 2021 Dec 24. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2022. PMID: 34958846 Review.
Cited by
-
Development of an integrated cardiac rehabilitation program to improve the adaptation level of patients after acute myocardial infarction.Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 17;11:1121563. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1121563. eCollection 2023. Front Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37139361 Free PMC article.
-
Economic evaluation protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial to compare Smartphone Cardiac Rehabilitation, Assisted self-Management (SCRAM) versus usual care cardiac rehabilitation among people with coronary heart disease.BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 26;10(8):e038178. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038178. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32847918 Free PMC article.
-
A Clinical Decision Support System for Remote Monitoring of Cardiovascular Disease Patients: A Clinical Study Protocol.Front Public Health. 2022 May 9;10:859890. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.859890. eCollection 2022. Front Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35615041 Free PMC article.
-
A Blockchain-Enabled Framework for mHealth Systems.Sensors (Basel). 2021 Apr 16;21(8):2828. doi: 10.3390/s21082828. Sensors (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33923842 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of smartphone-based interventions and monitoring on bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.World J Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 19;10(11):272-285. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v10.i11.272. eCollection 2020 Nov 19. World J Psychiatry. 2020. PMID: 33269223 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Piepoli MF, Corrà U, Adamopoulos S, Benzer W, Bjarnason-Wehrens B, Cupples M, Dendale P, Doherty P, Gaita D, Höfer S, McGee H, Mendes M, Niebauer J, Pogosova N, Garcia-Porrero E, Rauch B, Schmid JP, Giannuzzi P. Secondary prevention in the clinical management of patients with cardiovascular diseases. Core components, standards and outcome measures for referral and delivery: a policy statement from the cardiac rehabilitation section of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation. Endorsed by the Committee for Practice Guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014 Jun;21(6):664–81. doi: 10.1177/2047487312449597.2047487312449597 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Cowie A, Buckley J, Doherty P, Furze G, Hayward J, Hinton S, Jones J, Speck L, Dalal H, Mills J, British Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation (BACPR) Standards and core components for cardiovascular disease prevention and rehabilitation. Heart. 2019 Apr;105(7):510–5. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-314206. http://heart.bmj.com/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=30700518 heartjnl-2018-314206 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Woodruffe S, Neubeck L, Clark RA, Gray K, Ferry C, Finan J, Sanderson S, Briffa TG. Australian Cardiovascular Health and Rehabilitation Association (ACRA) core components of cardiovascular disease secondary prevention and cardiac rehabilitation 2014. Heart Lung Circ. 2015 May;24(5):430–41. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2014.12.008.S1443-9506(14)00822-1 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Balady GJ, Williams MA, Ades PA, Bittner V, Comoss P, Foody JA, Franklin B, Sanderson B, Southard D, American Heart Association Exercise‚ Cardiac Rehabilitation‚Prevention Committee. Council on Clinical Cardiology. Councils on Cardiovascular Nursing‚ Epidemiology and Prevention‚Nutrition‚ Physical Activity‚Metabolism. American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation Core components of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs: 2007 update: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention Committee, the Council on Clinical Cardiology; the Councils on Cardiovascular Nursing, Epidemiology and Prevention, and Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism; and the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2007;27(3):121–9. doi: 10.1097/01.HCR.0000270696.01635.aa.01273116-200705000-00001 - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials