Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jun;59(6):677-684.
doi: 10.1111/ijd.14767. Epub 2020 Feb 3.

Current therapies for actinic keratosis

Affiliations
Free article
Review

Current therapies for actinic keratosis

Caterina Dianzani et al. Int J Dermatol. 2020 Jun.
Free article

Abstract

Actinic keratosis (AK) is a very common skin disease caused by chronic sun damage, which in 75% of cases arises on chronically sun-exposed areas, such as face, scalp, neck, hands, and forearms. AKs must be considered an early squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) for their probable progression into invasive SCC. For this reason, all AK should be treated, and clinical follow-up is recommended. The aims of treatment are: (i) to clinically eradicate evident and subclinical lesions, (ii) to prevent their evolution into SCC, and (iii) to reduce the number of relapses. Among available treatments, it is possible to distinguish lesion-directed therapies and field-directed therapies. Lesion-directed treatments include: (i) cryotherapy; (ii) laser therapy; (iii) surgery; and (iv) curettage. Whereas, field-directed treatments are: (i) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU); (ii) diclofenac 3% gel; (iii) chemical peeling; (iv) imiquimod; and (v) photodynamic therapy (PDT). Prevention plays an important role in the treatment of AKs, and it is based on the continuous use of sunscreen and protective clothing. This review shows different types of available treatments and describes the characteristics and benefits of each medication, underlining the best choice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Boone MA, Suppa M, Marneffe A, et al. A new algorithm for the discrimination of actinic keratosis from normal skin and squamous cell carcinoma based on in vivo analysis of optical properties by high-definition optical coherence tomography. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2016; 30(10): 1714-1725.
    1. Pellacani G, Peris K, Guillen C, et al. A randomized trial comparing simultaneous vs. sequential field treatment of actinic keratosis with ingenol mebutate on two separate areas of the head and body. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2015; 29(11): 2192-2198.
    1. Costa C, Scalvenzi M, Ayala F, et al. How to treat actinic keratosis? An update. J Dermatol Case Rep 2015; 9(2): 29-35.
    1. Martin GM. Impact of interval and combination therapies on the management of actinic keratosis: review and clinical considerations. J Dermatolog Treat 2011; 22(5): 288-297.
    1. Stockfleth E. From a new vision of actinic keratosis to imiquimod 3.75%, the new treatment standard. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2015; 29(Suppl 1): 1-2.

MeSH terms