Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2020 Jan 29;56(2):56.
doi: 10.3390/medicina56020056.

Development of a Knee Joint CT-FEM Model in Load Response of the Stance Phase During Walking Using Muscle Exertion, Motion Analysis, and Ground Reaction Force Data

Affiliations
Case Reports

Development of a Knee Joint CT-FEM Model in Load Response of the Stance Phase During Walking Using Muscle Exertion, Motion Analysis, and Ground Reaction Force Data

Kunihiro Watanabe et al. Medicina (Kaunas). .

Abstract

Background and objectives: There are no reports on articular stress distribution during walking based on any computed tomography (CT)-finite element model (CT-FEM). This study aimed to develop a calculation model of the load response (LR) phase, the most burdensome phase on the knee, during walking using the finite element method of quantitative CT images. Materials and Methods: The right knee of a 43-year-old man who had no history of osteoarthritis or surgeries of the knee was examined. An image of the knee was obtained using CT and the extension position image was converted to the flexion angle image in the LR phase. The bone was composed of heterogeneous materials. The ligaments were made of truss elements; therefore, they do not generate strain during expansion or contraction and do not affect the reaction force or pressure. The construction of the knee joint included material properties of the ligament, cartilage, and meniscus. The extensor and flexor muscles were calculated and set as the muscle exercise tension around the knee joint. Ground reaction force was vertically applied to suppress the rotation of the knee, and the thigh was restrained. Results: An FEM was constructed using a motion analyzer, floor reaction force meter, and muscle tractive force calculation. In a normal knee, the equivalent stress and joint contact reaction force in the LR phase were distributed over a wide area on the inner upper surface of the femur and tibia. Conclusions: We developed a calculation model in the LR phase of the knee joint during walking using a CT-FEM. Methods to evaluate the heteromorphic risk, mechanisms of transformation, prevention of knee osteoarthritis, and treatment may be developed using this model.

Keywords: equivalent stress; finite element; joint reaction force; knee joint; musculoskeletal model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A finite element model of the right knee of a walking posture in the load response (LR) phase in a healthy person. On the left is a front view and on the right is a side view. Bone elements are yellow, truss elements are pink, the meniscus is light blue, and articular cartilage is green. Articular cartilage was set on the femur, tibia, and patella.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The setting of load and restraint condition in the right knee model. The femoral side was restrained and the quadriceps muscle was forced displacement (↑). The muscle was input in each direction, the lower end of the lower leg was vertical, and the load obtained in the gait analysis was input.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Image (a) shows the joint reaction force on the femoral joint surface, and (b) shows the joint reaction force on the tibial joint surface. Arrows in the figure indicate the magnitude and direction of the reaction force.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Image (a) shows the equivalent stress diagram on the femoral joint surface, and (b) shows the equivalent stress diagram on the tibial joint surface. The left side of the figure is the medial side. The range of stress values is 0–5 MPa; it was displayed in blue, green, yellow, and red in the low- to high-stress side.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Simulated muscle activation patterns of the RF (a), VM (b), VL (c), BF (d), and ST (e) muscles, and the measured EMG activity of RF (f), VM (g), VL (h), BF (i), and ST (j).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ackroyd R.T. Finite Element Methods for Particle Transport. Research Studies Press; Taunton, Somerset, UK: 1997. pp. 8–12.
    1. Jiang B. The Least-Squares Finite Element Method. Springer; New York, NY, USA: 1998. pp. 3–10.
    1. Bessho M., Ohnishi I., Matsumoto T., Ohashi S., Matsuyama J., Tobita K., Kaneko M., Nakamura K. Prediction of proximal femur strength using a CT-based nonlinear finite element method: Differences in predicted fracture load and site with changing load and boundary conditions. Bone. 2009;45:226–231. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2009.04.241. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brune A., Stiesch M., Eisenburger M., Greuling A. The effect of different occlusal contact situations on peri-implant bone stress—A contact finite element analysis of indirect axial loading. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2019;99:367–373. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.01.104. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hingsammer L., Pommer B., Hunger S., Stehrer R., Watzek G., Insua A. Influence of implant length and associated parameters upon biomechanical forces in finite element analyses: A systematic review. Implant Dent. 2019;28:296–305. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000879. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources