Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan 29;12(2):157.
doi: 10.3390/v12020157.

West Nile or Usutu Virus? A Three-Year Follow-Up of Humoral and Cellular Response in a Group of Asymptomatic Blood Donors

Affiliations

West Nile or Usutu Virus? A Three-Year Follow-Up of Humoral and Cellular Response in a Group of Asymptomatic Blood Donors

Elena Percivalle et al. Viruses. .

Abstract

West Nile virus (WNV) and Usutu virus (USUV) are two related arboviruses (genus Flavivirus, family Flaviviridae), with birds as a reservoir and mosquitoes as transmitting vectors. In recent years, WNV epidemiology changed in many European countries with increased frequency of outbreaks posing the issue of virus transmission risks by blood transfusion. USUV emerged for the first time in birds of the Tuscany region (Italy) in 1996 and in 2001 in Austria. While WNV is responsible for both mild and neuroinvasive diseases, USUV infection is usually asymptomatic and neuroinvasive symptoms are rare. Since WNV and USUV co-circulate, the surveillance of WNV allows also the detection of USUV. Due to the great similarity in amino-acid sequence of major surface proteins of the two viruses, a high cross-reactivity can lead to misinterpretation of serological results. Here, we report the results obtained from 54 asymptomatic blood donors during a three-year follow-up showing an unexpected high positivity (46.3%) for USUV. The major obstacle encountered in the differential diagnosis between these two viruses was the high cross-reactivity found in neutralizing antibodies (NT Abs) and, in some cases, a long follow-up was mandatory for a correct diagnosis. Moreover, two new ELISpot assays were developed for a more rapid and specific differential diagnosis, especially in those cases in which NT Abs were not determinant. Using a combination of Enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISpot), molecular, and serological tests, we could identify 25 true positive WNV and 25 true positive USUV blood donors. Our data highlight the importance of raising awareness for increasing USUV infections in endemic countries involved in blood transfusion and organ donation.

Keywords: Lombardia region; Usutu virus; West Nile virus; blood donors; flavivirus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
USUV and WNV NT antibodies in serum of two of the 13 blood donors with cross-reacting antibodies. Kinetics of WNV and USUV neutralization titer in two donors with true positive USUV infection followed for several months (a,b) and in two donors with true positive WNV infection (c,d) followed for several months are reported. If available, in the box, WNV and USUV ELISpot assay and PCR analysis results are reported. * net spots/million peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC).
Figure 2
Figure 2
WNV-specific T-cell response was measured in six WNV−/USUV− healthy volunteers (WNV−/USUV− controls (CTRLs)), 21 WNV true blood donors (WNV+ BDs), and 18 USUV true blood donors (USUV+ BDs) (a). Similarly, USUV-specific T-cell response was evaluated in five WNV−/USUV− healthy volunteers (WNV−/USUV− CTRLs), four WNV true blood donors (WNV+ BDs), and eight USUV true blood donors (USUV+ BDs) (b). Medians of WNV-specific T-cell response are given in the graph for all the three groups of subjects and p-values were measured using Mann-Whitney test (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hayes E.B., Sejvac J.J., Zaki S.R., Lanciotti R.S., Bode A.V., Campbell G.L. Virology, pathology, and clinical manifestation of West Nile virus disease. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2005;11:1174–1179. doi: 10.3201/eid1108.050289b. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Autorino G.L., Battisti A., Deubel V., Ferrari G., Forletta R., Giovannini A., Lelli R., Murri S., Scicluna M.T. West Nile virus epidemic in horses, Tuscany region, Italy. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2002;8:1372–1378. doi: 10.3201/eid0812.020234. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blitvich B.J. Transmission dynamics and changing epidemiology of West Nile virus. Anim. Health. Res. Rev. 2008;9:71–86. doi: 10.1017/S1466252307001430. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Healy J.M., Reisen W.K., Kramer V.L., Fischer M., Lindsey N.P., Nasci R.S., Macedo P.A., White G., Takahashi R., Khang L., et al. Comparison of the efficiency and cost of West Nile virus surveillance methods in California. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2015;15:147–155. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2014.1689. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rizzo C., Salcuni P., Nicoletti L., Ciufolini M.G., Russo F., Masala R., Frongia O., Finarelli A.C., Gramegna M., Gallo L., et al. Epidemiological surveillance of West Nile neuroinvasive diseases in Italy, 2008 to 2011. Euro Surveill. 2012;17:20172. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Supplementary concepts