Ropeginterferon alfa-2b versus standard therapy for polycythaemia vera (PROUD-PV and CONTINUATION-PV): a randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial and its extension study
- PMID: 32014125
- DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30236-4
Ropeginterferon alfa-2b versus standard therapy for polycythaemia vera (PROUD-PV and CONTINUATION-PV): a randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial and its extension study
Erratum in
-
Correction to Lancet Haematol 2020; 7: e196-208.Lancet Haematol. 2020 Apr;7(4):e279. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(20)30069-7. Epub 2020 Feb 25. Lancet Haematol. 2020. PMID: 32109379 No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: The PROUD-PV and CONTINUATION-PV trials aimed to compare the novel monopegylated interferon ropeginterferon alfa-2b with hydroxyurea, the standard therapy for patients with polycythaemia vera, over 3 years of treatment.
Methods: PROUD-PV and its extension study, CONTINUATION-PV, were phase 3, randomised, controlled, open-label, trials done in 48 clinics in Europe. Patients were eligible if 18 years or older with early stage polycythaemia vera (no history of cytoreductive treatment or less than 3 years of previous hydroxyurea treatment) diagnosed by WHO's 2008 criteria. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to ropeginterferon alfa-2b (subcutaneously every 2 weeks, starting at 100 μg) or hydroxyurea (orally starting at 500 mg/day). After 1 year, patients could opt to enter the extension part of the trial, CONTINUATION-PV. The primary endpoint in PROUD-PV was non-inferiority of ropeginterferon alfa-2b versus hydroxyurea regarding complete haematological response with normal spleen size (longitudinal diameter of ≤12 cm for women and ≤13 cm for men) at 12 months; in CONTINUATION-PV, the coprimary endpoints were complete haematological response with normalisation of spleen size and with improved disease burden (ie, splenomegaly, microvascular disturbances, pruritus, and headache). We present the final results of PROUD-PV and an interim analysis at 36 months of the CONTINUATION-PV study (per statistical analysis plan). Analyses for safety and efficacy were per-protocol. The trials were registered on EudraCT, 2012-005259-18 (PROUD-PV) and 2014-001357-17 (CONTINUATION-PV, which is ongoing).
Findings: Patients were recruited from Sept 17, 2013 to March 13, 2015 with 306 enrolled. 257 patients were randomly assigned, 127 were treated in each group (three patients withdrew consent in the hydroxyurea group), and 171 rolled over to the CONTINUATION-PV trial. Median follow-up was 182·1 weeks (IQR 166·3-201·7) in the ropeginterferon alfa-2b and 164·5 weeks (144·4-169·3) in the standard therapy group. In PROUD-PV, 26 (21%) of 122 patients in the ropeginterferon alfa-2b group and 34 (28%) of 123 patients in the standard therapy group met the composite primary endpoint of complete haematological response with normal spleen size. In CONTINUATION-PV, complete haematological response with improved disease burden was met in 50 (53%) of 95 patients in the ropeginterferon alfa-2b group versus 28 (38%) of 74 patients in the hydroxyurea group, p=0·044 at 36 months. Complete haematological response without the spleen criterion in the ropeginterferon alfa-2b group versus standard therapy group were: 53 (43%) of 123 patients versus 57 (46%) of 125 patients, p=0·63 at 12 months (PROUD-PV), and 67 (71%) of 95 patients versus 38 (51%) of 74 patients, p=0·012 at 36 months (CONTINUATION-PV). The most frequently reported grade 3 and grade 4 treatment-related adverse events were increased γ-glutamyltransferase (seven [6%] of 127 patients) and increased alanine aminotransferase (four [3%] of 127 patients) in the ropeginterferon alfa-2b group, and leucopenia (six [5%] of 127 patients) and thrombocytopenia (five [4%] of 127 patients) in the standard therapy group. Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in three (2%) of 127 patients in the ropeginterferon alfa-2b group and five (4%) of 127 patients in the hydroxyurea group. One treatment-related death was reported in the standard therapy group (acute leukaemia).
Interpretation: In patients with early polycythaemia vera, who predominantly presented without splenomegaly, ropeginterferon alfa-2b was effective in inducing haematological responses; non-inferiority to hydroxyurea regarding haematological response and normal spleen size was not shown at 12 months. However, response to ropeginterferon alfa-2b continued to increase over time with improved responses compared with hydroxyurea at 36 months. Considering the high and durable haematological and molecular responses and its good tolerability, ropeginterferon alfa-2b offers a valuable and safe long-term treatment option with features distinct from hydroxyurea.
Funding: AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Ropeginterferon alfa-2b versus phlebotomy in low-risk patients with polycythaemia vera (Low-PV study): a multicentre, randomised phase 2 trial.Lancet Haematol. 2021 Mar;8(3):e175-e184. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(20)30373-2. Epub 2021 Jan 18. Lancet Haematol. 2021. PMID: 33476571 Clinical Trial.
-
Long-term efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib versus best available therapy in polycythaemia vera (RESPONSE): 5-year follow up of a phase 3 study.Lancet Haematol. 2020 Mar;7(3):e226-e237. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30207-8. Epub 2020 Jan 23. Lancet Haematol. 2020. PMID: 31982039 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Ropeginterferon alfa-2b for the treatment of patients with polycythemia vera.Drugs Today (Barc). 2020 Mar;56(3):195-202. doi: 10.1358/dot.2020.56.3.3107706. Drugs Today (Barc). 2020. PMID: 32282866 Review.
-
Cost-effectiveness of ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft for the treatment of polycythemia vera.J Comp Eff Res. 2023 Sep;12(9):e230066. doi: 10.57264/cer-2023-0066. Epub 2023 Aug 2. J Comp Eff Res. 2023. PMID: 37531245 Free PMC article.
-
A pharmacokinetic evaluation of ropeginterferon alfa-2b in the treatment of polycythemia vera.Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2021 Jan;17(1):3-7. doi: 10.1080/17425255.2021.1839050. Epub 2020 Oct 29. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2021. PMID: 33118413 Review.
Cited by
-
Givinostat: an emerging treatment for polycythemia vera.Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2020 Jun;29(6):525-536. doi: 10.1080/13543784.2020.1761323. Epub 2020 Jul 21. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2020. PMID: 32693648 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Detection of the JAK2 V617F Mutation in Urinary Cell-free DNA in Patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.Intern Med. 2024 Jul 15;63(14):1987-1993. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.2837-23. Epub 2023 Nov 27. Intern Med. 2024. PMID: 38008450 Free PMC article.
-
JAK2 V617F allele burden in polycythemia vera: burden of proof.Blood. 2023 Apr 20;141(16):1934-1942. doi: 10.1182/blood.2022017697. Blood. 2023. PMID: 36745865 Free PMC article.
-
An alternative dosing strategy for ropeginterferon alfa-2b may help improve outcomes in myeloproliferative neoplasms: An overview of previous and ongoing studies with perspectives on the future.Front Oncol. 2023 Jan 19;13:1109866. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1109866. eCollection 2023. Front Oncol. 2023. PMID: 36776307 Free PMC article.
-
Conventional interferon-α 2b versus hydroxyurea for newly-diagnosed patients with polycythemia vera in a real world setting: a retrospective study based on 286 patients from a single center.Haematologica. 2022 Apr 1;107(4):991-995. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2021.280080. Haematologica. 2022. PMID: 34989218 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous