Prediction of Benign and Malignant Solid Renal Masses: Machine Learning-Based CT Texture Analysis
- PMID: 32014404
- DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.12.015
Prediction of Benign and Malignant Solid Renal Masses: Machine Learning-Based CT Texture Analysis
Abstract
Rationale and objectives: This study aimed to investigate whether benign and malignant renal solid masses could be distinguished through machine learning (ML)-based computed tomography (CT) texture analysis.
Materials and methods: Seventy-nine patients with 84 solid renal masses (21 benign; 63 malignant) from a single center were included in this retrospective study. Malignant masses included common renal cell carcinoma (RCC) subtypes: clear cell RCC, papillary cell RCC, and chromophobe RCC. Benign masses are represented by oncocytomas and fat-poor angiomyolipomas. Following preprocessing steps, a total of 271 texture features were extracted from unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT images. Dimension reduction was done with a reliability analysis and then with a feature selection algorithm. A nested-approach was used for feature selection, model optimization, and validation. Eight ML algorithms were used for the classifications: decision tree, locally weighted learning, k-nearest neighbors, naive Bayes, logistic regression, support vector machine, neural network, and random forest.
Results: The number of features with good reproducibility was 198 for unenhanced CT and 244 for contrast-enhanced CT. Random forest algorithm demonstrated the best predictive performance using five selected contrast-enhanced CT texture features. The accuracy and area under the curve metrics were 90.5% and 0.915, respectively. Having eliminated the highly collinear features from the analysis, the accuracy and area under the curve values slightly increased to 91.7% and 0.916, respectively.
Conclusion: ML-based contrast-enhanced CT texture analysis might be a potential method for distinguishing benign and malignant solid renal masses with satisfactory performance.
Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Radiomics; Renal mass; Texture analysis.
Copyright © 2020 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Artificial Intelligence and the Role of Radiologists.Acad Radiol. 2020 Oct;27(10):1430-1431. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.03.031. Epub 2020 May 6. Acad Radiol. 2020. PMID: 32386951 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Textural differences between renal cell carcinoma subtypes: Machine learning-based quantitative computed tomography texture analysis with independent external validation.Eur J Radiol. 2018 Oct;107:149-157. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.08.014. Epub 2018 Aug 16. Eur J Radiol. 2018. PMID: 30292260
-
Differentiation of benign from malignant solid renal lesions using CT-based radiomics and machine learning: comparison with radiologist interpretation.Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023 Feb;48(2):642-648. doi: 10.1007/s00261-022-03735-7. Epub 2022 Nov 12. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023. PMID: 36370180
-
Differentiation of fat-poor angiomyolipoma from clear cell renal cell carcinoma in contrast-enhanced MDCT images using quantitative feature classification.Med Phys. 2017 Jul;44(7):3604-3614. doi: 10.1002/mp.12258. Epub 2017 Jun 9. Med Phys. 2017. PMID: 28376281
-
CT-based radiomics for differentiating renal tumours: a systematic review.Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 May;46(5):2052-2063. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02832-9. Epub 2020 Nov 2. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021. PMID: 33136182
-
Review of Value of CT Texture Analysis and Machine Learning in Differentiating Fat-Poor Renal Angiomyolipoma from Renal Cell Carcinoma.Tomography. 2020 Dec;6(4):325-332. doi: 10.18383/j.tom.2020.00039. Tomography. 2020. PMID: 33364422 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of feature selection methods and subgroup factors on prognostic analysis with CT-based radiomics in non-small cell lung cancer patients.Radiat Oncol. 2021 Apr 30;16(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01810-9. Radiat Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33931085 Free PMC article.
-
Radiogenomics in Renal Cancer Management-Current Evidence and Future Prospects.Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Feb 27;24(5):4615. doi: 10.3390/ijms24054615. Int J Mol Sci. 2023. PMID: 36902045 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Artificial Intelligence in Urooncology: What We Have and What We Expect.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Aug 26;15(17):4282. doi: 10.3390/cancers15174282. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37686558 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Clinical Radiomics Nomogram Was Developed by Integrating Radiomics Signatures and Clinical Variables to Distinguish High-Grade ccRCC from Type 2 pRCC.J Oncol. 2022 Aug 26;2022:6844349. doi: 10.1155/2022/6844349. eCollection 2022. J Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36059810 Free PMC article.
-
Usefulness of computed tomography textural analysis in renal cell carcinoma nuclear grading.J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2022 Sep;9(5):054501. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.9.5.054501. Epub 2022 Sep 13. J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2022. PMID: 36120414 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical