Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Mar:84:101974.
doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2020.101974. Epub 2020 Jan 23.

KRAS G12C Game of Thrones, which direct KRAS inhibitor will claim the iron throne?

Affiliations
Review

KRAS G12C Game of Thrones, which direct KRAS inhibitor will claim the iron throne?

Misako Nagasaka et al. Cancer Treat Rev. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

Mutations in Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) are among the most common aberrations in cancer, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The lack of an ideal small molecule binding pocket in the KRAS protein and its high affinity towards the abundance of cellular guanosine triphosphate (GTP) renders the design of specific small molecule drugs challenging. Despite efforts, KRAS remains a challenging therapeutic target. Among the different known mutations; the KRASG12C (glycine 12 to cysteine) mutation has been considered potentially druggable. Several novel covalent direct inhibitors targeting KRASG12C with similar covalent binding mechanisms are now in clinical trials. Both AMG 510 from Amgen and MRTX849 from Mirati Therapeutics covalently binds to KRASG12C at the cysteine at residue 12, keeping KRASG12C in its inactive GDP-bound state and inhibiting KRAS-dependent signaling. Both inhibitors are being studied as a single agent or as combination with other targets. In addition, two novel KRAS G12C inhibitors JNJ-74699157 and LY3499446 will have entered phase 1 studies by the end of 2019. Given the rapid clinical development of 4 direct covalent KRAS G12C inhibitors within a short period of time, understanding the similarities and differences among these will be important to determine the best treatment option based on tumor specific response (NSCLC versus colorectal carcinoma), potential resistance mechanisms (i.e. anticipated acquired mutation at the cysteine 12 residue) and central nervous system (CNS) activity. Additionally, further investigation evaluating the efficacy and safety of combination therapies with agents such as immune checkpoint inhibitors will be important next steps.

Keywords: AMG 510; ARS 3248; Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog; MRTX 849; Non-small cell lung cancer; Targeted therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have not received any funding for this study and declare no direct conflict of interest. Dr. Nagasaka serves on the advisory board for AstraZeneca and has received study funding from Tempus. Dr. Sukari serves on the advisory board for Merck and Eisai. He has received study funding from Eisai. Dr. Ou declares the following including honorarium/speaker bureau: Pfizer, Astra Zeneca, Roche/Genentech, Takeda/ARIAD, Merck, honorarium/advisory: Pfizer, Astra Zeneca, Roche/Genentech, Takeda/ARIAD, stock ownership: Turning Point Therapeutics Inc and scientific Advisory Board (Former): Turning Point Therapeutics. All other authors have no potential conflict of interest to declare.

References

    1. Osta BE, Behera M, Kim S, Berry LD, Sica G, Pillai RN, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of patients with metastatic KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinomas: The Lung Cancer Mutation Consortium Experience. J Thorac Oncol 2019;14(5):876–889. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Biernacka A, Tsongalis PD, Peterson JD, de Abreu FB, Black CC, Gutmann EJ, et al. The potential utility of re-mining results of somatic mutation testing: KRAS status in lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Genet 2016;209:195–198. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Neumann J, Zeindl-Eberhart E, Kirchner T, Jung A. Frequency and type of KRAS mutations in routine diagnostic analysis of metastatic colorectal cancer. Pathol Res Pract 2009;205:858–862. - PubMed
    1. Forbes SA, Bindal N, Bamford S, et al. COSMIC; mining complete cancer genomes in the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer. Nucleic Acids Res 2011; 39:D945–50. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prior IA, Lewis PR, Mattos C. A comprehensive survey of Ras mutations in cancer. Cancer Res 2012; 72:2457–2467. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances