Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Feb;8(2):161-166.
doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-19-0692.

Immunotherapy of Pediatric Solid Tumors: Treatments at a Crossroads, with an Emphasis on Antibodies

Affiliations
Review

Immunotherapy of Pediatric Solid Tumors: Treatments at a Crossroads, with an Emphasis on Antibodies

Dana L Casey et al. Cancer Immunol Res. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Over the last decade, immunotherapy has rapidly changed the therapeutic landscape and prognosis for many hematologic malignancies and adult solid tumors. Despite this success, immunotherapy for pediatric solid tumors remains in the early stages of development, and significant clinical benefit has yet to be realized, with anti-GD2 for neuroblastoma being the exception. The limited neoepitope expression and paucity of T-cell infiltration into the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment have hampered current established immunotherapies. Emerging approaches to recruit T cells, to convert phenotypically "cold" into "inflamed" tumors, and to vastly improve therapeutic indices hold exceptional promise. Here, we review these approaches, highlighting the role of the tumor microenvironment and novel antibody platforms to maximize the full clinical potential of immunotherapy in pediatric oncology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Antibody-based Immunotherapy in Pediatric Solid Tumors: Fc-dependent and Fc-independent Mechanisms.
The low mutational burden in pediatric solid tumors, the immaturity of the immune system in children, downregulation of tumor HLA molecules, and the use of intensive chemotherapy all combine to make the tumor microenvironment of pediatric solid tumors poorly immunogenic (8). Examples of surface antigen–antibody pairs include: B7-H3 [Omburtamab, 8H9], CD20 [Rituximab], EGFR [cetuximab], GD2 [Naxitamab or Dinutuximab], GD3 [R24], HER2 [trastuzumab], PD-1 [Pembrolizumab or Nivolumab], PD-L1 [Atezolizumab]. A) In the presence of IgG monoclonal antibodies targeting one of these antigens, tumor cells succumb to Fc-dependent cytotoxic killing: antibody-dependent NK cell–mediated cytotoxicity (NK-ADCC); granulocyte-mediated ADCC (granulocyte-ADCC); complement-mediated cytotoxicity (CMC) by binding to C1q (thereby activating the complement cascade); antibody-dependent macrophage-mediated phagocytosis; and CR3-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity through recognition of complement breakdown products (e.g. C3bi). B) Through genetic engineering, IgG antibodies can now be reformatted to engage T cells, which have no Fc receptor functions, by exploiting chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) or bispecific antibodies (anti-GD2 × anti-CD3), where polyclonal T cells can be driven into cold tumors as tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) to initiate the tumor killing process. Multistep pre-targeted radioimmunotherapy (PRIT) and external-beam radiation therapy can also be utilized to increase neoantigen presentation and TIL infiltration. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as a monotherapy have been largely unsuccessful in pediatric solid tumors due to the paucity of neoepitopes and low number of TILs, but combinatorial approaches with radiotherapy, bispecifics, or CAR T cells that can attract TILs are promising for enhanced functioning of ICIs. Cytokines such as IL2, IL15, and IL21 can also combat the “cold” phenotype by attracting T cells and NK cells to the tumor. CR3, complement receptor 3; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; GD2, disialoganglioside GD2; GD3, disialoganglioside GD3; GPC2, glypican-2; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; L1CAM, L1 cell-adhesion molecule.

References

    1. Downing JR, Wilson RK, Zhang J, Mardis ER, Pui CH, Ding L, et al. The Pediatric Cancer Genome Project. Nat Genet 2012;44(6):619–22 doi 10.1038/ng.2287. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yu AL, Gilman AL, Ozkaynak MF, London WB, Kreissman SG, Chen HX, et al. Anti-GD2 antibody with GM-CSF, interleukin-2, and isotretinoin for neuroblastoma. N Engl J Med 2010;363(14):1324–34 doi 10.1056/NEJMoa0911123. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cheung NK, Cheung IY, Kushner BH, Ostrovnaya I, Chamberlain E, Kramer K, et al. Murine Anti-GD2 Monoclonal Antibody 3F8 Combined With Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor and 13-Cis-Retinoic Acid in High-Risk Patients With Stage 4 Neuroblastoma in First Remission. J Clin Oncol 2012;30(26):3264–70 doi 10.1200/JCO.2011.41.3807. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schreiber RD, Old LJ, Smyth MJ. Cancer immunoediting: integrating immunity’s roles in cancer suppression and promotion. Science 2011;331(6024):1565–70 doi 10.1126/science.1203486. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Samstein RM, Lee CH, Shoushtari AN, Hellmann MD, Shen R, Janjigian YY, et al. Tumor mutational load predicts survival after immunotherapy across multiple cancer types. Nat Genet 2019;51(2):202–6 doi 10.1038/s41588-018-0312-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types