Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan-Mar;12(1):19-24.
doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_113_19. Epub 2019 Dec 23.

The learning curve for robotic-assisted pyeloplasty in children: Our initial experience from a single center

Noor Nabi Junejo  1   2 , Anwar Alotaibi  3 , Saeed Malwi Alshahrani  4 , Ahmad Alshammari  2   5 , Craig A Peters  6 , Hamdan Alhazmi  7 , Santiago A Vallasciani  8
Affiliations

The learning curve for robotic-assisted pyeloplasty in children: Our initial experience from a single center

Noor Nabi Junejo et al. Urol Ann. 2020 Jan-Mar.

Abstract

Background: Robotic-assisted pyeloplasty surgery has become the preferred approach of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) in pediatrics. However, to our knowledge, there is limited data on the learning curve for robotic-assisted pyeloplasty in children and no similar study from Saudi Arabia.

Aims: The objective of the study was to evaluate the progression of the surgical team performing robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) and to assess the feasibility of the RALP in children, since it is having been recently started in the Kingdom.

Settings and design: Retrospective charts and surgical videos review at the tertiary care centre.

Subjects and methods: After approval from the internal review board (IRB), we reviewed the surgical video recording of the RALP procedure of 15 patients presented with UPJO from January 2016 to October 2017. Statistical analysis was done for the variables includes dissection time, pyelotomy, anastomosis on both sides, and total surgery time and calculated in minutes. Renal ultrasound reviewed to assess any change in grade.

Results: Fifteen patients with UPJO underwent RALP. Of 15 cases, nine were primary and six cases as secondary UPJO. The median age was 8 (3-15) years. Out of 15 cases, 13 and 2 patients diagnosed as Society for Fetal Urology grades of 4 and 3, respectively. Total operative time was prolonged in secondary group as compared to primary pyeloplasty group (mean [standard deviation (SD)]: 166.3 [35.1], range: 125-223, P = 0.0028 versus mean (SD): 149.17 (30.4), range: (114-207), P = 0.0008). The success rate was 100% in primary and 84% in secondary cases. The median length of follow-up was 12.0 (7.0-18.0) and 10.0 (8.0-12.5) months in primary and secondary cases, respectively. The overall complication rate was 13% (2/15) (Clavien grade: 1-2).

Conclusions: The evaluation of the learning curve of RALP for this group of patients concluded that total operative time for RALP, performed by the pediatric urology team, steadily decreased with collective surgical experience.

Keywords: Learning curve; pediatric; pyeloplasty; robotics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Graph 1
Graph 1
Graphical representation for all cases
Graph 2
Graph 2
Graphical representation for primary cases
Graph 3
Graph 3
Graphical representation for secondary cases
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Patel NS, Muneer A, Mushtaq I. Laparoscopy as a foundation and its limitations and pitfalls in reconstructive paediatric urology. In: Gundeti MS, editor. Pediatric Robotic and Reconstructive Urology: A Comprehensive Guide. Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, UK; 2012.s. pp. 51–7.
    1. Carr MC, Casale P. Anomalies and surgery of the ureter in children. In: Wein AJ, editor. Campbell-Walsh Urology. Vol. 4. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders Publishers, USA; 2012. pp. 3212–35.
    1. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: Five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187–96. - PubMed
    1. Peters CA. Robotic pyeloplasty--the new standard of care? J Urol. 2008;180:1223–4. - PubMed
    1. Morales-López RA, Pérez-Marchán M, Pérez Brayfield M. Current concepts in pediatric robotic assisted pyeloplasty. Front Pediatr. 2019;7:4. - PMC - PubMed