Whom should we ask? A systematic literature review of the arguments regarding the most accurate source of information for valuation of health states
- PMID: 32016683
- PMCID: PMC7253527
- DOI: 10.1007/s11136-020-02426-4
Whom should we ask? A systematic literature review of the arguments regarding the most accurate source of information for valuation of health states
Abstract
To determine and critically evaluate the arguments in the published literature regarding the most accurate source of information for valuation of health states: values based on experienced health states (patient values) or values based on described health states (general public values).
Keywords: Described health state; Experienced health state; General public values; Health state valuation; Hypothetical health state; Patient values.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Nord E. Cost-value analysis in health care. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
-
- Brazier J, Akehurst R, Brennan A, et al. Should patients have a greater role in valuing health states? Applied Health Economics and Health Policy. 2005;4(4):201–208. - PubMed
-
- Dolan P. Developing methods that really do value the ‘Q’ in the QALY. Health Economics, Policy and Law. 2008;3(1):69–77. - PubMed
-
- Dolan P, Kahneman D. Interpretations of utility and their implications for the valuation of health. The Economic Journal. 2008;118:215–234.
-
- Dolan P. NICE should value real experiences over hypothetical opinions. Nature. 2009;462(7269):35. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
