Immunologic impact of chemoradiation in cervical cancer and how immune cell infiltration could lead toward personalized treatment
- PMID: 32017078
- DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32893
Immunologic impact of chemoradiation in cervical cancer and how immune cell infiltration could lead toward personalized treatment
Abstract
We investigated the potential of tumor-infiltrating immune cells (ICs) as predictive or prognostic biomarkers for cervical cancer patients. In total, 38 patients treated with (chemo)radiotherapy and subsequent surgery were included in the current study. This unique treatment schedule makes it possible to analyze IC markers in pretreatment and posttreatment tissue specimens and their changes during treatment. IC markers for T cells (CD3, CD4, CD8 and FoxP3), macrophages (CD68 and CD163) and B cells (CD20), as well as IL33 and PD-L1, were retrospectively analyzed via immunohistochemistry. Patients were grouped in the low score or high score group based on the amount of positive cells on immunohistochemistry. Correlations to pathological complete response (pCR), cause-specific survival (CSS) and metastasis development during follow-up were evaluated. In analysis of pretreatment biopsies, significantly more pCR was seen for patients with CD8 = CD3, CD8 ≥ CD4, positive IL33 tumor cell (TC) scores, IL33 IC < TC and PD-L1 TC ≥5%. Besides patients with high CD8 scores, also patients with CD8 ≥ CD4, CD163 ≥ CD68 or PD-L1 IC ≥5% had better CSS. In the analysis of posttreatment specimens, less pCR was observed for patients with high CD8 or CD163 scores. Patients with decreasing CD8 or CD163 scores between pretreatment and posttreatment samples showed more pCR, whereas those with increasing CD8 or decreasing IL33 IC scores showed a worse CSS. Meanwhile, patients with an increasing CD3 score or stable/increasing PD-L1 IC score showed more metastasis during follow-up. In this way, the intratumoral IC landscape is a promising tool for prediction of outcome and response to (chemo)radiotherapy.
Keywords: biomarker; cervical cancer; chemoradiation; immunologic response; tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes.
© 2020 UICC.
References
-
- Stewart BW, Wild CP. World Cancer report 2014. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2014. 630.
-
- Koh W-J, Abu-Rustum NR, Bean S, et al. Cervical Cancer, version 3.2019, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2019;17:64-84.
-
- Koh W-J, Greer BE, Abu-rustum NR, et al. Cervical Cancer, version 2.2015, featured updates to the NCCN guidelines. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2015;13:395-404.
-
- Pötter R, Haie-meder C, Van Limbergen E, et al. Recommendations from gynaecological (GYN) GEC ESTRO working group (II): concepts and terms in 3D image-based treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy-3D dose volume parameters and aspects of 3D image-based anatomy, radiation physics, radiobiology. Radiother Oncol 2006;78:67-77.
-
- Tummers P, Makar A, Vandecasteele K, et al. Completion surgery after intensity-modulated arc therapy in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer: feasibility, surgical outcome, and oncologic results. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2013;23:877-83.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
