Cost-effectiveness analysis of fecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease
- PMID: 32017248
- DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15002
Cost-effectiveness analysis of fecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease
Abstract
Background and aim: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients are at risk for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (RCDI). We aimed to evaluate the potential health economic and clinical outcomes of four strategies for management of RCDI in IBD patients from the perspective of public health-care provider in Hong Kong.
Methods: A decision-analytic model was designed to simulate outcomes of adult IBD patients with first RCDI treated with vancomycin, vancomycin plus bezlotoxumab, fidaxomicin and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). Model inputs were derived from literature and public data. Primary model outcomes were C. difficile infection (CDI)-related direct medical cost and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) loss. Base-case and sensitivity analysis were performed.
Results: Comparing to vancomycin, fidaxomicin and vancomycin plus bezlotoxumab, FMT saved 0.00318, 0.00149 and 0.00306 QALYs and reduced cost by USD3180, USD3790 and USD5514, respectively, in base-case analysis. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, FMT was cost-saving when comparing to vancomycin, fidaxomicin and vancomycin plus bezlotoxumab by USD3765 (95% confidence interval [CI] 3732-3798; P < 0.001), USD3854 (95%CI 3827-3883; P < 0.001) and USD6501 (95%CI 6465-6,536; P < 0.001), respectively. The QALYs saved by FMT (vs vancomycin) were 0.00386 QALYs (95%CI 0.00384-0.00388; P < 0.001), (vs fidaxomicin) 0.00179 QALYs (95%CI 0.00177-0.00180; P < 0.001) and (vs vancomycin plus bezlotoxumab) 0.00376 QALYs (95%CI 0.00374-0.00378; P < 0.001). FMT was found to save QALYs at lower cost in 99.3% (vs vancomycin), 99.7% (vs fidaxomicin) and 100.0% (vs vancomycin plus bezlotoxumab) of the 10 000 Monte Carlo simulations.
Conclusions: FMT for IBD patients with RCDI appeared to save both direct medical cost and QALYs when comparing to vancomycin (with or without bezlotoxumab) and fidaxomicin.
Keywords: bezlotoxumab; cost-effectiveness analysis; fecal microbiota transplantation; fidaxomicin; inflammatory bowel disease; recurrent Clostridium difficile infection; vancomycin.
© 2020 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of fecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015 Apr;36(4):438-44. doi: 10.1017/ice.2014.80. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015. PMID: 25782899
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of ribotype-guided fecal microbiota transplantation in Chinese patients with severe Clostridium difficile infection.PLoS One. 2018 Jul 26;13(7):e0201539. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201539. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30048534 Free PMC article.
-
Fecal Transplants by Colonoscopy and Capsules Are Cost-Effective Strategies for Treating Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection.Dig Dis Sci. 2020 Apr;65(4):1125-1133. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05821-1. Epub 2019 Sep 6. Dig Dis Sci. 2020. PMID: 31493042
-
Prevention of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Anaerobe. 2020 Feb;61:102098. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2019.102098. Epub 2019 Sep 4. Anaerobe. 2020. PMID: 31493500
-
Cost-effectiveness of three different strategies for the treatment of first recurrent Clostridium difficile infection diagnosed in a community setting.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018 Aug;39(8):924-930. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.139. Epub 2018 Jul 2. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018. PMID: 29961435
Cited by
-
Human immunology and immunotherapy: main achievements and challenges.Cell Mol Immunol. 2021 Apr;18(4):805-828. doi: 10.1038/s41423-020-00530-6. Epub 2020 Sep 2. Cell Mol Immunol. 2021. PMID: 32879472 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Fecal microbiota transplantation for COVID-19; a potential emerging treatment strategy.Med Hypotheses. 2021 Feb;147:110476. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2020.110476. Epub 2020 Dec 31. Med Hypotheses. 2021. PMID: 33482620 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and Safety of Faecal Microbiota Transplantation for Acute Pancreatitis: A Randomised, Controlled Study.Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jan 10;8:772454. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.772454. eCollection 2021. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 35083238 Free PMC article.
-
Management of Clostridioides difficile infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.Intest Res. 2021 Jul;19(3):265-274. doi: 10.5217/ir.2020.00045. Epub 2020 Aug 18. Intest Res. 2021. PMID: 32806873 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of genotype screening and therapeutic drug monitoring in patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with azathioprine therapy: a Chinese healthcare perspective using real-world data.Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jul;9(14):1138. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-1980. Ann Transl Med. 2021. PMID: 34430579 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Peery AF, Dellon ES, Lund J et al. Burden of gastrointestinal disease in the United States: 2012 update. Gastroenterology 2012; 143: 117-1187.
-
- Steiner C, Barrett M, Weiss A. HCUP projections: Clostridium difficile hospitalizations 2001 to 2013. 2014; Available at (): http://www.hcupus.ahrq.gov/reports/projections/2014-01.pdf.
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Biggest threats and data. 2018; Available at (): https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/biggest_threats.html#cdiff
-
- Ho J, Dai RZW, Kwong TNY et al. Disease burden of Clostridium difficile infections in adults, Hong Kong, China, 2006-2014. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2017; 23: 1671-1679.
-
- Nguyen GC, Kaplan GG, Harris ML, Brant SR. A national survey of the prevalence and impact of Clostridium difficile infection among hospitalized inflammatory bowel disease patients. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2008; 103: 1443-1450.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources