Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Feb;46(2):215-222.
doi: 10.1111/jog.14155.

New therapeutic approaches for the fertility-sparing treatment of endometrial cancer

Affiliations
Review

New therapeutic approaches for the fertility-sparing treatment of endometrial cancer

Akira Mitsuhashi et al. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

This review seeks to describe new fertility-sparing endometrial cancer (EC) treatment strategies that take into consideration the medical and general health background of patients. We particularly focus on the application of metformin, which is a biguanide widely prescribed for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Fertility-sparing treatment using progestin is considered a standard treatment option for patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) and EC who desire to conceive. A previous meta-analysis of fertility-sparing treatments revealed a high remission rate; however, high rates of relapse persisted. Most young patients with AEH and EC who are subjected to fertility-sparing treatment have a background of obesity, insulin resistance and abnormal glucose tolerance complicated with polycystic ovary syndrome. Recently, metformin has been attracting more attention in the field of cancer research. Several in vitro and in vivo reports regarding the efficacy of metformin in EC management have accumulated. Thus far, the efficacy of combining metformin with progestin has been revealed in a single phase II study of medroxyprogesterone acetate in combination with metformin as a fertility-sparing treatment for patients with AEH or EC. In addition to improving the metabolic profile of patients with EC having metabolic disorders, metformin supplementation may improve the long-term oncological outcome of these patients. To date, many clinical trials employing progestin and metformin as a fertility-sparing treatment of AEH and EC are ongoing. In the near future, it is expected that the clinical advantage of metformin progestin combination therapy will be clarified.

Keywords: endometrial cancer; fertility-sparing treatment; metabolic disorder; metformin; progestin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin 2019; 69: 7-34.
    1. Bhaskaran K, Douglas I, Forbes H, dos-Santos-Silva I, Leon DA, Smeeth L. Body-mass index and risk of 22 specific cancers: A population-based cohort study of 5·24 million UK adults. Lancet 2014; 384: 755-765.
    1. Bianchini F, Kaaks R, Vainio H. Overweight, obesity, and cancer risk. Lancet Oncol 2002; 3: 565-574.
    1. Key TJA, Pike MC. The dose-effect relationship between ‘unopposed’ oestrogens and endometrial mitotic rate: Its central role in explaining and predicting endometrial cancer risk. Br J Cancer 1988; 57: 205-212.
    1. Crosbie EJ, Zwahlen M, Kitchener HC, Egger M, Renehan AG. Body mass index, hormone replacement therapy, and endometrial cancer risk: A meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010; 19: 3119-3130.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources