Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 28;38(10):2292-2297.
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.01.075. Epub 2020 Feb 1.

Application of a cost-effectiveness analysis of pathogen-specific vaccines against gastroenteritis to a military population in a developing country setting

Affiliations

Application of a cost-effectiveness analysis of pathogen-specific vaccines against gastroenteritis to a military population in a developing country setting

Sarah-Blythe Ballard et al. Vaccine. .

Abstract

Vaccine implementation planning in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) often focuses on children without considering special adult populations. We adapted an economic model developed by the United States Department of Defense (DoD) to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of vaccine acquisition strategies for Campylobacter-, ETEC-, Shigella-, and norovirus-associated gastroenteritis. We compared implementation costs with current medical management in the Peruvian armed forces, a special population of low- and middle-income (LMIC) adults with a high incidence of infectious gastroenteritis. Pathogen-specific vaccine implementation resulted in calculated cost-effectiveness ratio (CER) per duty day lost averted (CERDDL) of $13,741; $1,272; $301; and $803, and a CER per diarrhea day averted of $2,130; $215; $51; and $199 for Campylobacter, ETEC, Shigella, and norovirus, respectively. These estimates compare favorably to CERDDL estimates from high-income military population and suggest that implementing vaccines gastroenteritis may be cost-effective in the Peruvian military population.

Keywords: Cost-effectiveness analysis; Gastroenteritis; Low- and middle-income countries; Military; Peru; Vaccine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Tornado analyses for (A) Campylobacter; (B) ETEC; (C) Shigella; and (D) norovirus vaccine cost-effectiveness ratios demonstrating top ten parameters influencing the cost-effectiveness ratio per duty day lost averted outcome in the model.
Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Tornado analyses for (A) Campylobacter; (B) ETEC; (C) Shigella; and (D) norovirus vaccine cost-effectiveness ratios demonstrating top ten parameters influencing the cost-effectiveness ratio per duty day lost averted outcome in the model.

References

    1. Ballard SB, Saito M, Mirelman AJ, Bern C, Gilman RH. Tropical and travel-associated norovirus: current concepts. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2015;28:408–16. 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000197. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ballard SB, Reaves EJ, Luna CG, Silva ME, Rocha C, Heitzinger K, et al. Epidemiology and genetic characterization of noroviruses among adults in an endemic setting, peruvian amazon basin, 2004–2011. PLoS ONE 2015;10: e0131646. 10.1371/journal.pone.0131646. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alsentzer E, Vera DM, Neyra J, Loayza L, Hora RA, Osorio VB, et al. Monitoring acute diarrhea via an electronic surveillance system in the Peruvian Navy ISDS Conf Abstr 2014.
    1. Mirelman AJ, Ballard SB, Saito M, Kosek MN, Gilman RH. Cost-effectiveness of norovirus vaccination in children in Peru. Vaccine 2015;33:3084–91. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.05.004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tallant A, Porter CK, Putnam SD, Tribble DR, Hooper TI, Riddle MS. Relative cost-effectiveness of a norovirus vaccine in the deployed military setting compared to a vaccine against Campylobacter sp., ETEC, and Shigella sp. Vaccine 2014;32:5156–62. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.07.070. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types