Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 4:368:m7.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.m7.

Association between financial links to indoor tanning industry and conclusions of published studies on indoor tanning: systematic review

Lola Adekunle  1 , Rebecca Chen  1 , Lily Morrison  1 , Meghan Halley  1 , Victor Eng  1 , Yogi Hendlin  2 , Mackenzie R Wehner  3   4 , Mary-Margaret Chren  5 , Eleni Linos  1
Affiliations

Association between financial links to indoor tanning industry and conclusions of published studies on indoor tanning: systematic review

Lola Adekunle et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess whether an association exists between financial links to the indoor tanning industry and conclusions of indoor tanning literature.

Design: Systematic review.

Data sources: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, up to 15 February 2019.

Study selection criteria: Articles discussing indoor tanning and health were eligible for inclusion, with no article type restrictions (original research, systematic reviews, review articles, case reports, editorials, commentaries, and letters were all eligible). Basic science studies, articles describing only indoor tanning prevalence, non-English articles, and articles without full text available were excluded.

Results: 691 articles were included in analysis, including empiric articles (eg, original articles or systematic reviews) (357/691; 51.7%) and non-empiric articles letters (eg, commentaries, letters, or editorials) (334/691; 48.3%). Overall, 7.2% (50/691) of articles had financial links to the indoor tanning industry; 10.7% (74/691) articles favored indoor tanning, 3.9% (27/691) were neutral, and 85.4% (590/691) were critical of indoor tanning. Among the articles without industry funding, 4.4% (27/620) favored indoor tanning, 3.5% (22/620) were neutral, and 92.1% (571/620) were critical of indoor tanning. Among the articles with financial links to the indoor tanning industry, 78% (39/50) favored indoor tanning, 10% (5/50) were neutral, and 12% (6/50) were critical of indoor tanning. Support from the indoor tanning industry was significantly associated with favoring indoor tanning (risk ratio 14.3, 95% confidence interval 10.0 to 20.4).

Conclusions: Although most articles in the indoor tanning literature are independent of industry funding, articles with financial links to the indoor tanning industry are more likely to favor indoor tanning. Public health practitioners and researchers need to be aware of and account for industry funding when interpreting the evidence related to indoor tanning.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42019123617.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: no support from any organization for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
PRISMA flow diagram
Fig 2
Fig 2
Number of indoor tanning articles by year between 1970 and 2018, using final analytic sample of articles
Fig 3
Fig 3
Proportion of published articles on indoor tanning according to financial links and stance on indoor tanning
Fig 4
Fig 4
Forest plot including primary, secondary, and sensitivity analyses. Relative risks of industry funded paper being in favor of tanning (relative to non-industry funded paper) with 95% confidence intervals
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Wehner MR, Chren MM, Nameth D, et al. International prevalence of indoor tanning: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol 2014;150:390-400. 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.6896 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wehner MR, Shive ML, Chren MM, Han J, Qureshi AA, Linos E. Indoor tanning and non-melanoma skin cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2012;345:e5909. 10.1136/bmj.e5909 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mosher CE, Danoff-Burg S. Indoor tanning, mental health, and substance use among college students: the significance of gender. J Health Psychol 2010;15:819-27. 10.1177/1359105309357091 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ashrafioun L, Bonar EE. Tanning addiction and psychopathology: Further evaluation of anxiety disorders and substance abuse. J Am Acad Dermatol 2014;70:473-80. 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.10.057 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heckman CJ, Coups EJ, Manne SL. Prevalence and correlates of indoor tanning among US adults. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008;58:769-80. 10.1016/j.jaad.2008.01.020 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms