Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 4;5(1):e00756-19.
doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00756-19.

Quantitative Models of Phage-Antibiotic Combination Therapy

Affiliations

Quantitative Models of Phage-Antibiotic Combination Therapy

Rogelio A Rodriguez-Gonzalez et al. mSystems. .

Abstract

The spread of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria is a global public health crisis. Bacteriophage therapy (or "phage therapy") constitutes a potential alternative approach to treat MDR infections. However, the effective use of phage therapy may be limited when phage-resistant bacterial mutants evolve and proliferate during treatment. Here, we develop a nonlinear population dynamics model of combination therapy that accounts for the system-level interactions between bacteria, phage, and antibiotics for in vivo application given an immune response against bacteria. We simulate the combination therapy model for two strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, one which is phage sensitive (and antibiotic resistant) and one which is antibiotic sensitive (and phage resistant). We find that combination therapy outperforms either phage or antibiotic alone and that therapeutic effectiveness is enhanced given interaction with innate immune responses. Notably, therapeutic success can be achieved even at subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics, e.g., ciprofloxacin. These in silico findings provide further support to the nascent application of combination therapy to treat MDR bacterial infections, while highlighting the role of innate immunity in shaping therapeutic outcomes.IMPORTANCE This work develops and analyzes a novel model of phage-antibiotic combination therapy, specifically adapted to an in vivo context. The objective is to explore the underlying basis for clinical application of combination therapy utilizing bacteriophage that target antibiotic efflux pumps in Pseudomonas aeruginosa In doing so, the paper addresses three key questions. How robust is combination therapy to variation in the resistance profiles of pathogens? What is the role of immune responses in shaping therapeutic outcomes? What levels of phage and antibiotics are necessary for curative success? As we show, combination therapy outperforms either phage or antibiotic alone, and therapeutic effectiveness is enhanced given interaction with innate immune responses. Notably, therapeutic success can be achieved even at subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotic. These in silico findings provide further support to the nascent application of combination therapy to treat MDR bacterial infections, while highlighting the role of system-level feedbacks in shaping therapeutic outcomes.

Keywords: antimicrobial agents; bacteriophage therapy; bacteriophages; evolutionary biology; mathematical modeling; microbial ecology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Schematic of the phage-antibiotic combination therapy model. Antibiotic-sensitive bacteria (BA) and phage-sensitive bacteria (BP) are targeted by antibiotic (A) and the phage (P), respectively. Host innate immune response interactions (pink arrows) are included in the in vivo model. Innate immunity (I) is activated by the presence of bacteria and attacks both bacterial strains. Furthermore, in model versions accounting for partial resistance (blue arrows), BA and BP are targeted by both antibiotic and phage but at quantitatively different levels.
FIG 2
FIG 2
Dynamics of the immunophage therapy model against two different bacterial inocula. We simulate the phage therapy model developed in reference against two infection settings. In the first infection setting (a), a phage-sensitive bacterial inoculum, BP (orange solid line), is challenged with phage (blue dashed line) inside an immunocompetent host. In the second scenario (b), antibiotic-sensitive bacteria, BA (green solid line), are challenged with phage in the presence of an active immune response (purple dashed line). The initial bacterial density and the initial phage density are B0 = 7.4 × 107 CFU/g and P0 = 7.4 × 108 PFU/g, respectively. For the simulation, we use a heterogeneous mixing model as a functional form of phage infection. The growth rates of BP and BA are rP = 0.75 h−1 and rA = 0.67 h−1, respectively. Simulation run is 96 h with phage being administered 2 h after the infection. The bacterial carrying capacity is KC = 1010 CFU/g.
FIG 3
FIG 3
Outcomes of the phage-antibiotic combination therapy model for two different infection settings. We simulate the combined effects of phage and antibiotics in an immunocompetent host infected with phage-sensitive bacteria (a), BP (orange solid line). In panel b, the host is infected with antibiotic-sensitive bacteria, BA (green solid line). The dynamics of the phage (blue dashed line) and innate immunity (purple dashed line) are shown for each infection setting. Initial bacterial density and phage density are B0 = 7.4 × 107 CFU/g and P0 = 7.4 × 108 PFU/g, respectively. For the simulation, we use a heterogeneous mixing model as a functional form of phage infection. The simulation run is 96 h (4 days). Antibiotic and phage are administered 2 h after the beginning infection. Ciprofloxacin is maintained at a constant concentration of 0.0350μg/ml during the simulation. The carrying capacity of the bacteria is KC = 1010 CFU/g.
FIG 4
FIG 4
Bacterial dynamics given joint exposure to phage and antibiotic. We simulate bacterial growth for 96 h in exposure to phage (blue dashed line) and antibiotic (data not shown) added 2 h after the beginning of the inoculation. The combination of phage and antibiotic is tested against two different bacterial inocula. The first inoculum consisted of exclusively phage-sensitive bacteria (a to c), BP (orange solid line). The second inoculum consisted of antibiotic-sensitive bacteria (d to f), BA (green solid line). Additionally, we test three different models of phage infection, heterogeneous mixing (a and d), phage saturation (b and e), and linear infection (c and f). The initial bacterial density and phage density are B0 = 7.4 × 107 CFU/g and P0 = 7.4 × 108 PFU/g, respectively. Ciprofloxacin is maintained at a constant concentration of 2.5× MIC (i.e., 0.0350 μg/ml) during the simulations.
FIG 5
FIG 5
Outcomes of the robustness analysis for different antimicrobial strategies. We simulate the exposure of bacteria to different antimicrobial strategies, such as antibiotic-only (a), antibiotic plus innate immunity (b), phage plus antibiotic (c), and phage-antibiotic combination in the presence of innate immunity (d). The heatmaps show the bacterial density at 96 h postinfection. Colored regions represent bacterial persistence (e.g., orange areas for ∼109 CFU/g and bright yellow areas for ∼1010 CFU/g), while the white regions represent pathogen clearance. We vary the concentration of ciprofloxacin (MIC = 0.014μg/ml), ranging from 0.1× MIC (0.0014 μg/ml) to 10× MIC (0.14 μg/ml), and the bacterial composition of the inoculum, ranging from 100% phage-sensitive bacteria (0% BA) to 100% antibiotic-sensitive bacteria (100% BA). Initial bacterial density and phage density (c and d) are B0 = 7.4 × 107 CFU/g and P0 = 7.4 × 108 PFU/g, respectively. Phage and antibiotic are administered 2 h after the beginning of the infection.

References

    1. World Health Organization. 2017. Antibacterial agents in clinical development: an analysis of the antibacterial clinical development pipeline, including tuberculosis. Technical report WHO/EMP/IAU/2017.12. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2013. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2013. Technical report. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA.
    1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control and European Medicines Agency. 2009. The bacterial challenge: time to react. Technical report EMEA/576176/2009. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control/European Medicines Agency, Solna, Sweden.
    1. Oechslin F, Piccardi P, Mancini S, Gabard J, Moreillon P, Entenza JM, Resch G, Que Y-A. 2017. Synergistic interaction between phage therapy and antibiotics clears Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in endocarditis and reduces virulence. J Infect Dis 215:703–712. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiw632. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roach DR, Leung CY, Henry M, Morello E, Singh D, Santo JPD, Weitz JS, Debarbieux L. 2017. Synergy between the host immune system and bacteriophage is essential for successful phage therapy against an acute respiratory pathogen. Cell Host Microbe 22:38–47. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2017.06.018. - DOI - PubMed