Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Feb 4;11(1):689.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14314-z.

Organizing genome engineering for the gigabase scale

Affiliations
Review

Organizing genome engineering for the gigabase scale

Bryan A Bartley et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

Genome-scale engineering holds great potential to impact science, industry, medicine, and society, and recent improvements in DNA synthesis have enabled the manipulation of megabase genomes. However, coordinating and integrating the workflows and large teams necessary for gigabase genome engineering remains a considerable challenge. We examine this issue and recommend a path forward by: 1) adopting and extending existing representations for designs, assembly plans, samples, data, and workflows; 2) developing new technologies for data curation and quality control; 3) conducting fundamental research on genome-scale modeling and design; and 4) developing new legal and contractual infrastructure to facilitate collaboration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. As capabilities for genome engineering have advanced rapidly, the size of teams involved in each pioneering genome engineering project has also increased.
a From 1980 to present, the size of the largest engineered genomes has grown exponentially, doubling approximately every 3 years. This trend suggests that gigabase engineering could become feasible by 2050. b The number of authors credited with producing these genomes has also grown exponentially. This trend suggests that engineering gigabase genomes will require the effort of ~500 individuals—either directly as part of a team or indirectly through an ecosystem of tools, services, automation, and other resources. The data for this figure are provided in Table 1.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The emerging design–build–test–learn workflow for genome engineering is shown schematically with current (solid arrows) and likely future (dashed arrows) tasks, interfaces (circles), and repositories (cylinders), either digital (light) or physical (dark).

References

    1. Boeke JD, et al. The genome project-write. Science. 2016;353:126–127. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf6850. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carlson, R. H. Biology Is Technology: The Promise, Peril, and New Business of Engineering Life (Harvard University Press, 2011).
    1. Hughes RA, Ellington AD. Synthetic DNA synthesis and assembly: putting the synthetic in synthetic biology. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2017;9:a023812. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a023812. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chari R, Church GM. Beyond editing to writing large genomes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2017;18:749. doi: 10.1038/nrg.2017.59. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khorana HG. Total synthesis of a gene. Science. 1979;203:614–625. doi: 10.1126/science.366749. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types