Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 4;10(1):1753.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58666-4.

Effectiveness of hemostatic agents in thyroid surgery for the prevention of postoperative bleeding

Affiliations

Effectiveness of hemostatic agents in thyroid surgery for the prevention of postoperative bleeding

Martino Scaroni et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Postoperative bleeding remains one of the most frequent, but rarely life-threatening complications in thyroid surgery. Although arterial bleeding is the main cause of postoperative hemorrhage, most often no actively bleeding vessel can be found during revision. Therefore, the coagulation technique for larger vessels may play a minor role, and hemostatic agents could be of higher importance. In this descriptive, retrospective study, data of 279 patients with thyroid surgery (total of 414 thyroid lobectomies) were collected. We reviewed the electronic medical record by analyzing the histological, operative, laboratory and discharge reports in regards to postoperative bleeding. Of the 414 operated thyroid lobes, 2.4% (n = 10) bled. 1.4% (n = 6) needed reoperation while the other 1.0% (n = 4) could be treated conservatively. Hemostatic patches were applied 286 (69.1%) times. Of the 128 (30.9%) patch-free operated sides, 4.7% (n = 6) suffered postoperative bleeding. Tachosil® alone was used 211 (51.0%) times and bleeding occurred in 1.4% (n = 3). Without statistical significance (p = 0.08) the use of Tachosil® seems to help preventing postoperative bleeding. The combination with other patches doesn't appear to be more efficient.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aleksandar K, Miodagl D, Nebojsa D, Ilija G. Effect of fibrin vs cellulose based haemostatic agents with traditional haemostatic procedures in thyroid surgery. Pak J Med Sci. 2017;33:1360–1365. doi: 10.12669/pjms.336.13692. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sadowski SM, Kebebew E. Which hemostatic surgical devices should be used for thyroid surgery, or should we just continue to clamp and tie? Thyroid. 2013;23:1047–1048. doi: 10.1089/thy.2013.0286. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Testini M, et al. The effectiveness of FloSeal matrix hemostatic agent in thyroid surgery: a prospective, randomized, control study. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2009;394:837–842. doi: 10.1007/s00423-009-0497-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Polychronidis G., Hüttner F. J., Contin P., Goossen K., Uhlmann L., Heidmann M., Knebel P., Diener M. K., Büchler M. W., Probst P. Network meta-analysis of topical haemostatic agents in thyroid surgery. British Journal of Surgery. 2018;105(12):1573–1582. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10975. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Margolick J, Chen W, Wiseman SM. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Unplanned Reoperations, Emergency Department Visits and Hospital Readmission After Thyroidectomy. Thyroid. 2018;28:624–638. doi: 10.1089/thy.2017.0543. - DOI - PubMed