Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Ezetimibe as the Add-on Treatment to Moderate-Dose Rosuvastatin versus High-Dose Rosuvastatin in the Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases in China: A Markov Model Analysis
- PMID: 32021100
- PMCID: PMC6969683
- DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S213968
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Ezetimibe as the Add-on Treatment to Moderate-Dose Rosuvastatin versus High-Dose Rosuvastatin in the Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases in China: A Markov Model Analysis
Abstract
Background: For patients with inadequate control of cholesterol using moderate-dose statins in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases (CVD), either doubling the dose of statins or adding ezetimibe should be considered. The cost-effectiveness of them is unknown in the Chinese context. The aim of this study is to compare the cost and effectiveness of the two regimens, and estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).
Methods: A Markov model of five health statuses were used to estimate long-term costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of the two treatment regimens from the healthcare perspective. The effectiveness data used to calculate the transition probability was based on a previously published randomized trial. The utility data was gathered from literature and the costs were gathered from the electronic medical record system of West China Hospital in Chinese Yuan (CNY) in 2017 price. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were conducted.
Results: The ICER for ezetimibe plus moderate-dose rosuvastatin was 47,102.99 CNY per QALY for 20 years simulation, which did not reach the threshold of per capita gross domestic product (GDP) of 59,660 CNY per QALY in 2017 in China. Non-CVD-related mortality and CVD-related mortality contributed most to the ICER.
Conclusion: Adding ezetimibe to the moderate-dose statin in secondary prevention for CVD is cost-effective, compared with the high-dose statin in the Chinese context whose low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) was not inadequately controlled by moderate-dose statin alone.
Keywords: Markov model; cost-effectiveness analysis; ezetimibe; lipid-lowering treatment; rosuvastatin; secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases.
© 2020 Yang et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Figures
References
-
- Health and Family Planning Commission of the People’s Republic of China. Graphic: report on nutrition and chronic disease status of Chinese residents; 2015. Available from: http://www.nhc.gov.cn/jkj/s5879/201506/4505528e65f3460fb88685081ff158a2..... Accessed 8 January 2020.
-
- Critchley J, Liu J, Zhao D, Wei W, Capewell S. Explaining the increase in coronary heart disease mortality in Beijing between 1984 and 1999. Circulation. 2004;110(10):1236–1244. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000140668.91896.AE - DOI - PubMed
-
- Joint committee for guideline revision National Expert Committee on Cardiovascular Diseases, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases Chinese Society of Cardiology, Chinese Medical Association Chinese Diabetes Society, Chinese Medical Association Chinese Society of Endocrinology, Chinese Medical Association Chinese Society of Laboratory Medicine, Chinese Medical Association. Chinese guidelines for the management of dyslipidemia in adults. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2016;2018(15):1–29. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Jellinger PS, Handelsman Y, Rosenblit PD, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists And American College of endocrinology guidelines for management of dyslipidemia and prevention of cardiovascular disease. Endocr Pract. 2017;23(4):479–497. doi:10.4158/EP171764.GL - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
