Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 1:13:22.
doi: 10.1186/s13068-020-1664-8. eCollection 2020.

Fumarate production with Rhizopus oryzae: utilising the Crabtree effect to minimise ethanol by-product formation

Affiliations

Fumarate production with Rhizopus oryzae: utilising the Crabtree effect to minimise ethanol by-product formation

Reuben M Swart et al. Biotechnol Biofuels. .

Abstract

Background: The four-carbon dicarboxylic acids of the tricarboxylic acid cycle (malate, fumarate and succinate) remain promising bio-based alternatives to various precursor chemicals derived from fossil-based feed stocks. The double carbon bond in fumarate, in addition to the two terminal carboxylic groups, opens up an array of downstream reaction possibilities, where replacement options for petrochemical derived maleic anhydride are worth mentioning. To date the most promising organism for producing fumarate is Rhizopus oryzae (ATCC 20344, also referred to as Rhizopus delemar) that naturally excretes fumarate under nitrogen-limited conditions. Fumarate excretion in R. oryzae is always associated with the co-excretion of ethanol, an unwanted metabolic product from the fermentation. Attempts to eliminate ethanol production classically focus on enhanced oxygen availability within the mycelium matrix. In this study our immobilised R. oryzae process was employed to investigate and utilise the Crabtree characteristics of the organism in order to establish the limits of ethanol by-product formation under growth and non-growth conditions.

Results: All fermentations were performed with either nitrogen excess (growth phase) or nitrogen limitation (production phase) where medium replacements were done between the growth and the production phase. Initial experiments employed excess glucose for both growth and production, while the oxygen partial pressure was varied between a dissolved oxygen of 18.4% and 85%. Ethanol was formed during both growth and production phases and the oxygen partial pressure had zero influence on the response. Results clearly indicated that possible anaerobic zones within the mycelium were not responsible for ethanol formation, hinting that ethanol is formed under fully aerobic conditions as a metabolic overflow product. For Crabtree-positive organisms like Saccharomyces cerevisiae ethanol overflow is manipulated by controlling the glucose input to the fermentation. The same strategy was employed for R. oryzae for both growth and production fermentations. It was shown that all ethanol can be eliminated during growth for a glucose addition rate of 0.07 g L - 1 h - 1 . The production phase behaved in a similar manner, where glucose addition of 0.197 g L - 1 h - 1 resulted in fumarate production of 0.150 g L - 1 h - 1 and a yield of 0.802 g g - 1 fumarate on glucose. Further investigation into the effect of glucose addition revealed that ethanol overflow commences at a glucose addition rate of 0.395 g g - 1 h - 1 on biomass, while the maximum glucose uptake rate was established to be between 0.426 and 0.533 g g - 1 h - 1 .

Conclusions: The results conclusively prove that R. oryzae is a Crabtree-positive organism and that the characteristic can be utilised to completely discard ethanol by-product formation. A state referred to as "homofumarate production" was illustrated, where all carbon input exits the cell as either fumarate or respiratory CO 2 . The highest biomass-based "homofumarate production": rate of 0.243 g g - 1 h - 1 achieved a yield of 0.802 g g - 1 on glucose, indicating the bounds for developing an ethanol free process. The control strategy employed in this study in conjunction with the uncomplicated scalability of the immobilised process provides new direction for further developing bio-fumarate production.

Keywords: Crabtree effect; Ethanol; Fumarate; Fumaric acid; Immobilised fermentation; Rhizopus oryzae.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The postulated effect of glucose limitation on growth and fumarate production fermentations. Glucose uptake rates are controlled via fed-batch fermentation and are indicated with a reducing valve on the incoming glucose flux. It is postulated that glucose throttling will reduce ethanol formation in both growth and fumarate production fermentations
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Repeat profiles of metabolite accumulation under growth conditions using 3.1 g/L of glucose and nitrogen excess. The circles and triangles identify the two repeat runs. Notable production of ethanol and fumarate was observed, with 0.62±0.097gL-1 of biomass obtained at the end of the run. Fitted model indicate biomass accumulation up to the final measured point. The model employed fixed yield coefficients of ethanol and fumarate on glucose (0.211 and 0.058, respectively). The estimated maximum specific growth rate was found to be 0.255h-1 and the Monod constant was 0.176gL-1
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The effect of DO on fumarate production where 50gL-1 of glucose was initially used. The DO was varied from 18.4 to 85%. A negligible difference was observed between the two runs
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Glucose, ethanol and fumarate concentrations during fed-batch growth of R. oryzae. Glucose was added at a constant rate of 0.07gL-1h-1. All concentrations approximate zero, except glucose in the initial stages of the experiment. Ethanol overflow was clearly avoided
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Glucose dosing rates for run 1 and 2. The dosing rate of run 1 was increased by 50% once. Towards the end of the fermentation, dosing was stopped and the glucose concentration was depleted. The dosing rate of run 2 was increased three times by 50% of the original rate
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Fumarate production profiles for runs 1 and 2. Note the slight increase in fumarate excretion rates in regimes B and C
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Ethanol profiles for runs 1 and 2. Beyond the first 25-h transition phase, no ethanol overflow is observed in run 1. Run 2 exhibits clear ethanol overflow in regimes B and C where glucose addition rates were increased
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Glucose profiles for runs 1 and 2. Glucose breakthrough is observed for run 2 in regime C, where glucose addition rate exceeds the glucose consumption rate

References

    1. Werpy T, Petersen GR. Top Value Added Chemicals from Biomass: Volume I – Results of Screening for Potential Candidates from Sugars and Synthesis Gas. Technical report, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States); 2004. 10.2172/15008859. http://www.osti.gov/scitech//servlets/purl/15008859-s6ri0N/native/http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/15008859/.
    1. Jansen MLA, van Gulik WM. Towards large scale fermentative production of succinic acid. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2014;30:190–197. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2014.07.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grand View Research. Maleic anhydride market analysis by application(unsaturated polyster resins, BDO, additives, copolymers) and segmentForecasts To 2020. Technical report; 2014.
    1. Nystrom RF, Loo YH, Leak JC. Synthesis of fumaric acid-2-C 14 and maleic anhydride-2-C 14 1. J Am Chem Soc. 1952;74(13):3434–3435. doi: 10.1021/ja01133a521. - DOI
    1. Sebastian J, Hegde K, Kumar P, Rouissi T, Brar SK. Bioproduction of fumaric acid: an insight into microbial strain improvement strategies. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2019;39(6):817–834. doi: 10.1080/07388551.2019.1620677. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources