Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Sep;62(5):1223-1244.
doi: 10.1002/bimj.201900184. Epub 2020 Feb 5.

Skew-normal random-effects model for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Skew-normal random-effects model for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies

Zelalem F Negeri et al. Biom J. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Hierarchical models are recommended for meta-analyzing diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies. The bivariate random-effects model is currently widely used to synthesize a pair of test sensitivity and specificity using logit transformation across studies. This model assumes a bivariate normal distribution for the random-effects. However, this assumption is restrictive and can be violated. When the assumption fails, inferences could be misleading. In this paper, we extended the current bivariate random-effects model by assuming a flexible bivariate skew-normal distribution for the random-effects in order to robustly model logit sensitivities and logit specificities. The marginal distribution of the proposed model is analytically derived so that parameter estimation can be performed using standard likelihood methods. The method of weighted-average is adopted to estimate the overall logit-transformed sensitivity and specificity. An extensive simulation study is carried out to investigate the performance of the proposed model compared to other standard models. Overall, the proposed model performs better in terms of confidence interval width of the average logit-transformed sensitivity and specificity compared to the standard bivariate linear mixed model and bivariate generalized linear mixed model. Simulations have also shown that the proposed model performed better than the well-established bivariate linear mixed model in terms of bias and comparable with regards to the root mean squared error (RMSE) of the between-study (co)variances. The proposed method is also illustrated using a published meta-analysis data.

Keywords: diagnostic test accuracy; meta-analysis; sensitivity; skew-normal random-effects; specificity.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. In E. Parzen, K. Tanabe, & G. Kitagawa (Eds.), Selected papers of Hirotugu Akaike (pp. 215-222). New York: Springer.
    1. Arellano-Valle, B. R., Bolfarine, H., & Lachos, H. V. (2005). Skew-normal linear mixed models. Journal of Data Science, 3, 415-438.
    1. Arnold, B. V., & Beaver, J. R. (2002). Skewed multivariate models related to hidden truncation and/or selective reporting. Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, 11, 7-54.
    1. Azzalini, A., & Dalla Valle, A. (1996). The multivariate skew-normal distribution. Biometrika, 83, 715-726.
    1. Baker, R., & Jackson, D. (2008). A new approach to outliers in meta-analysis. Health Care Management Science, 11, 121-132.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources