Editorial Comment: Robotic versus other nephroureterectomy techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 87,000 cases
- PMID: 32022526
- PMCID: PMC7025833
- DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.02.11
Editorial Comment: Robotic versus other nephroureterectomy techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 87,000 cases
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
Comment on
-
Robotic versus other nephroureterectomy techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 87,000 cases.World J Urol. 2020 Apr;38(4):845-852. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-03020-1. Epub 2019 Nov 26. World J Urol. 2020. PMID: 31773242
References
-
- 1. De Groote R, Decaestecker K, Larcher A, Buelens S, De Bleser E, D’Hondt F, et al. Robot-assisted nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: results from three high-volume robotic surgery institutions. J Robot Surg. 2019;30. [Epub ahead of print] - PubMed
- De Groote R, Decaestecker K, Larcher A, Buelens S, De Bleser E, D’Hondt F, et al. Robot-assisted nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: results from three high-volume robotic surgery institutions. 30J Robot Surg. 2019 Epub ahead of print. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources